If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed, registering will remove the in post advertisements. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This means you should apply for your renewal now to avoid any disruptions to your membership whilst the renewal process is taking place! NOTE: If you have an auto renewing subscription this will happen automatically.
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)
Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
On paper, the Mk6 Golf GTI DSG has a better power to weight ratio (112 kW per tonne) than the Mk5 Golf GTI DSG (108 kW per tonne), but the official 0 - 100 km/h acceleration times are identical, at 6.9 seconds for both variants.
The second generation Lexus RX350 has a power to weight ratio of 113 kW per tonne (204 kW / 1810 kg tare) and the Mk6 Golf GTI DSG has a power to weight ratio of 112 kW per tonne (155 kW / 1380 kg tare).
Despite this, the Golf has the faster 0 - 100 km/h acceleration time, but the RX350 would not be far behind. During a road test conducted by the NRMA, the RX350 did the 0 - 100 sprint in 7.2 seconds.
Out of interest, the official 0 - 100 km/h acceleration time for the Mk5 Golf GTI manual is also 7.2 seconds.
Overall though, the Golf GTI (any variant) is the faster car point to point, for obvious reasons.
The point at which peak power will affect the 0-100 times as will torque curve. If it is at a high rev then it may be slower depending on gearing. A wide power and torque band will be easier to get better times and be nicer to live with than a high peaky engine. Both cars are similar, so I would probably get the Mk6 with a lower km. A good MY09 Mk5 could also sway me taking into account extras fitted on each.
And why did VW claim the manual and DSG mk6 GTI's did the same 0-100 time of 6.9 secs yet the manual mk5 took 7.2 secs? Is there something different in the manual gearboxes of the mk5 and mk6?
VW are pretty conservative in their acceleration quotes. While the Mk6 was officially at 6.9 I recall Motor got a particularly nice example (in friendly conditions) down to around 6.2 in stock DSG form.
I have no doubt the Mk7 is quicker than a Mk6, and that the Mk6 was quicker than the Mk5. But we are talking marginal differences and at the end of the day buy what suits your needs and budget. All will give you a smile.
--- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs
Comment