Originally posted by Sharkie
View Post
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mk6 Golf Acceleration & Performance Data
Collapse
X
-
-
As I posted somewhere else this week:

Might be .1 or .2 out but impressive nonetheless. Only have Stage 1 APR and a bit of extra weight in the boot. Used Sport mode with TCS on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryan_R View PostAs I posted somewhere else this week:

Might be .1 or .2 out but impressive nonetheless. Only have Stage 1 APR and a bit of extra weight in the boot. Used Sport mode with TCS on.
That's damned good for a stage 1 118!2008 VRS Wagon. Yellow, very yellow!
Forever blowing bubbles.
Comment
-
In that case - even better. Very good time. The change into 3rd gear to hit 100kph sux and hurts the times in the manuals doesn't it.Originally posted by Pullstarter View PostVery silly
Manual, cheers Lucas 
Comment
-
Yeah it does a bit. Mind you I think the ESP may hurt more. Will try some runs with the ESP off soon.Originally posted by Lucas_R View PostIn that case - even better. Very good time. The change into 3rd gear to hit 100kph sux and hurts the times in the manuals doesn't it.2008 VRS Wagon. Yellow, very yellow!
Forever blowing bubbles.
Comment
-
Is the mk6 GTI faster (or slower) than the mk5 GTI?
Hi guys
Not trying to stir up trouble or be a troll.
Had a 2008 Mk5 GTI some time ago which I sold in 2010...hence my absence from here for a few years...
But couldn't quite shake the desire for one, so now hoping to buy a 2010 Mk6 GTI to replace my Lexus RX350!
Was wondering whether the Mk6 is actually perhaps slower (in overtaking) than the Mk5? Both with DSG.
I read that in some review/test/forum, but can't find the reference.
I also drove a mk6 yesterday for the first time, but couldn't really tell (maybe coz the salesman was with me!)
Was wondering what the consensus from owners and road tests was?
cheers
Satz
Comment
-
Both would handle better and be quicker than the RX350
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline
2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 125TSI Build
Comment
-
Each generation gets slighty faster.
I think the Mk5 to Mk6 was 0.1 seconds quicker but it did add the XDL to limit wheelspin.
Comment
-
On paper, the Mk6 Golf GTI DSG has a better power to weight ratio (112 kW per tonne) than the Mk5 Golf GTI DSG (108 kW per tonne), but the official 0 - 100 km/h acceleration times are identical, at 6.9 seconds for both variants.
The second generation Lexus RX350 has a power to weight ratio of 113 kW per tonne (204 kW / 1810 kg tare) and the Mk6 Golf GTI DSG has a power to weight ratio of 112 kW per tonne (155 kW / 1380 kg tare).
Despite this, the Golf has the faster 0 - 100 km/h acceleration time, but the RX350 would not be far behind. During a road test conducted by the NRMA, the RX350 did the 0 - 100 sprint in 7.2 seconds.
Out of interest, the official 0 - 100 km/h acceleration time for the Mk5 Golf GTI manual is also 7.2 seconds.
Overall though, the Golf GTI (any variant) is the faster car point to point, for obvious reasons.
Comment
-
The point at which peak power will affect the 0-100 times as will torque curve. If it is at a high rev then it may be slower depending on gearing. A wide power and torque band will be easier to get better times and be nicer to live with than a high peaky engine. Both cars are similar, so I would probably get the Mk6 with a lower km. A good MY09 Mk5 could also sway me taking into account extras fitted on each.08 MY09 R32, DBP, DSG, GIAC, R8V10 reps, KW V3, RNS510/VIM/BT/MDI, region free DVD, switched Haldex, s2t paddles,HPA dogbone rubber,Mk7 climatronics, FIS+, Adams/RDA discs & Hawk pads, Garage button, GruppeM. Front fogs, Milltek. CF Chin spoiler.Strut support. LEDs Alloy front suspension bits.....
http://photobucket.com/gregsr32
Comment
-
VW are pretty conservative in their acceleration quotes. While the Mk6 was officially at 6.9 I recall Motor got a particularly nice example (in friendly conditions) down to around 6.2 in stock DSG form.
I have no doubt the Mk7 is quicker than a Mk6, and that the Mk6 was quicker than the Mk5. But we are talking marginal differences and at the end of the day buy what suits your needs and budget. All will give you a smile.
--- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm -------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs
Comment
2025 - Below Forum
Collapse


Comment