I think you guys are a bit harsh on the WRX's, pre 09 OK but the later models with the VF52 turbo aren't too shabby when fitted with leather and they're 15,000 20,000 cheaper than an R - thats quite a lot. The two cars are not the same at all but the Rex is very easily cheaply modified to easily be quicker than your R too and the same flash that everyone is using removes the roughness totally. Look at the cost of aftermarket parts and you will cry V our shaftings. Their suspension is a bit lame but really so too is the R's its slightly better for sure but its no track weapon either. The WRX's brakes are smaller and gearbox only 5 spd stereo crap and its not as pretty as a golf but who sees that when you are driving the thing. Both cars have very good resale too unlike all the other options and both are AWD which I love
So if I did not have 60K road to spend on a good all rounder like an R and only $45K I would get a Rex. or maybe a second hand R8 but that would require an additional $150K
I will work on this
So if I did not have 60K road to spend on a good all rounder like an R and only $45K I would get a Rex. or maybe a second hand R8 but that would require an additional $150K

Comment