Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tigger73's 125TSI Tiguan Build Thread
Collapse
X
-
It's a little upsetting that 100000km's is considered high mileage (kilometreage?) these days...
-
How about a mid 6s 0-100 Amarok then ....
.. Even keeps it in the VW family ...... 
And with all the space you could possibly ask for for a growing family.
Leave a comment:
-
Don't tell me my best option is to go and buy a truck and bolt a second row of seats to it....Originally posted by Ramee View PostI found the perfect car for you tigger, it is Isuzu MU-X. It fit to all of your requirements plus it got MU-X factor. LoL.
Seriously there's not much options to replace a stage 2 Tig, either you will have to look into porsche Cayenne range or will have to look into AMG ML versions. Also new MBQ Tig either going to be too big so loose the fun factor or going to be same size so may not be large enough. I bet all MBQ Tigs will not have anything bigger than 2L engine so if they are going to be bigger forget about the fun factor.
Another option for you I think is to sell both of your cars Mazda and Tig when time comes and buy a boring large SUV for your wife and kids and buy a MK7 GTI or R for yourself so that you don't have any regrets
Nothing against the Isuzu though as I'm sure it's quite a capable off-road vehicle and quite well suited to pulling a caravan. But with a 0-100 time of 11+ secs due to lugging around 2.6 tonnes with a 130kW motor is not my idea of a fun time.
I've toyed with the idea of keeping the Tig as a second car and trading in the wife's Mazda3 but the whole idea is to sell the car with the high kms. It may still happen this way but I think this may be against my better judgement.
Leave a comment:
-
I found the perfect car for you tigger, it is Isuzu MU-X. It fit to all of your requirements plus it got MU-X factor. LoL.Originally posted by tigger73 View Post
I need a little more space and want to keep the fun factor but don't want to pay twice the price.
Bring on the MQB Tig!!!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seriously there's not much options to replace a stage 2 Tig, either you will have to look into porsche Cayenne range or will have to look into AMG ML versions. Also new MBQ Tig either going to be too big so loose the fun factor or going to be same size so may not be large enough. I bet all MBQ Tigs will not have anything bigger than 2L engine so if they are going to be bigger forget about the fun factor.
Another option for you I think is to sell both of your cars Mazda and Tig when time comes and buy a boring large SUV for your wife and kids and buy a MK7 GTI or R for yourself so that you don't have any regrets
Leave a comment:
-
...or maybe I could saw off their legs.Originally posted by MGV View PostIs one of the kids particularly naughtier than the other 2? Maybe downsizing the family would be an easier option!
But that doesn't change the fact that I do relatively high mileage and will be hitting 100,000km soon. I really ought to be looking to update in the next 12 months or so either way.
Leave a comment:
-
Is one of the kids particularly naughtier than the other 2? Maybe downsizing the family would be an easier option!
Leave a comment:
-
Tigger73's VW Tiguan 125 TSI Build Thread
Yes you've hit the nail on the head team_v. My problem exactly.Originally posted by team_v View PostThe GLA250 is probably a good option for a Tig sized replacement in the Euro marques.
The problem is that the tig is such a good package.
37k base + 3k for downpipe and tune and you are well ahead of anything else in the CUV market and even better than a lot of the SUV market for power and extras.
To get the next size up SUV requires a lot more $$$ (around 70k) but also loses the fun factor as you can't really chuck around a touareg, prado or a captiva 7 etc that may fit 3 kids in the back comfortable.
I need a little more space and want to keep the fun factor but don't want to pay twice the price.
Bring on the MQB Tig!!!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
The GLA250 is probably a good option for a Tig sized replacement in the Euro marques.
The problem is that the tig is such a good package.
37k base + 3k for downpipe and tune and you are well ahead of anything else in the CUV market and even better than a lot of the SUV market for power and extras.
To get the next size up SUV requires a lot more $$$ (around 70k) but also loses the fun factor as you can't really chuck around a touareg, prado or a captiva 7 etc that may fit 3 kids in the back comfortable.Last edited by team_v; 11-06-2014, 12:08 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
The Kia & Hyundai are worth a look.
My Captiva comments are based on the fact that she had a diesel Captiva 4-5 years back (with several cars in-between) and nothing appears to have changed in that time except the gearbox. It wasn't a badly appointed car 5 years back but when put up against it's peers now it's a bit dated.
Leave a comment:
-
So you're suggesting that it's better to plead for forgiveness than ask for permission?Originally posted by AdamD View PostI'd be trying to convince her of the virtues of a Passat Alltrack, or else the 220FSI V6 wagon. She'll just have to get used to it, as it's either a larger sports SUV (too expensive, as you say), or a wagon of some description. The Passats are both very good looking cars IMO.
I suppose there's always the Commodore Sportswagon... I'd never recommend one, but they look quite nice in profile and from the rear.
Interestingly the V6 wagon has better fuel economy than the sedan... And just sneaks under the 9.6l/100 too
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
Yes agree green vehicle guide is just that - a guide. How you drive has a much bigger influence on actual fuel consumption.Originally posted by brad View PostThat just shows how useless the Green Vehicle Guide is.
Captiva is not a vehicle I'd recomend if you've owned a VW & like gadgets / creature comforts / smooth ride / good suspension control. Just don't go there.
But from a company perspective it's about as good as you can get in terms of setting a benchmark.
Agree with the Captiva sentiments. I'd also put the other Korean cars in the same group - Kia, Hyundai. Though have to admit I haven't driven any of them recently.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
That just shows how useless the Green Vehicle Guide is.
Captiva is not a vehicle I'd recomend if you've owned a VW & like gadgets / creature comforts / smooth ride / good suspension control. Just don't go there.
Leave a comment:
-
Tigger73's VW Tiguan 125 TSI Build Thread
Fortunately my company goes by the green vehicle guide and as long as it's under 9.6l/100km for combined cycle, I don't have to contribute to the fuel bill - no matter how I drive
So in fact the new SV6 Commodore does actually make the grade as well as Captiva (however not the 7 seater).
I've had an SV6 (VE) and not really a big fan. Especially how quickly they go through rear tyres. Plus depreciation on the Commodore is pretty woeful. It's a possibility but interior is not as nice and it also doesn't have AWD. But RWD is at least better on dirt roads than FWD.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Leave a comment:
-
I doubt it would achieve the company fuel consumption goals in real world running unless tigger does lots of hwy work sitting on 80-100.Originally posted by AdamD View PostI suppose there's always the Commodore Sportswagon... I'd never recommend one, but they look quite nice in profile and from the rear.
I know it has a bigger body & more wind resistance but my wife's 2013 V6 Captiva averages 14L/100km on ULP. 18L/100km on E85. 90% urban running. Thank the Gods that I don't have to pay for it.
Leave a comment:
2025 - Below Forum
Collapse

Leave a comment: