Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)

Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
2 of 2 < >

Welcome to the new look VWWatercooled

After much work and little sleep there is a new version of the forums running on more powerful and recent hardware as well as an upgraded software platform.

Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.

The new forum software is an upgraded version of what came before, it's mostly the same but also a little different. Hopefully easier to use and more stable than before. We are learning together here, so please be patient. If you have questions, please post them here. If you have worked something out and can provide an answer,
See more
See less

R32 Fuel Consumption

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • R32 Fuel Consumption

    Hi All,
    Im new to this forum and generally new to VWs, i have come from a honda/nissan past. But as it states i would like to know how many kms all you r32 owners are getting out of a tank and what sort of driving your doing as i'm very keen in purchasing a 3dr DSG R32 once i sell my 05 accord Euro Luxury (If anyone whats to swap please let me know).
    I do about 50/50 highway traffic driving excluding putting the right foot down.
    Cheers

    Ps: i have tried to do a search not much came up, dunno if its coz no1 cares.

  • #2
    i get 450-500km from a tank of BP Ultimate 98 octane petrol. you should be getting at least the same if not more kms (being an MK5 DSG)
    1991 BMW 318is RED E30

    Comment


    • #3
      MkV has quite reasonably better fuel economy than the MkIV from what I've seen.
      I get about the same fuel economy as Balkanac but bear in mind this only happens once you get a CAI on it.
      Be interesting to see what the MkV boys have to say.
      sigpic
      2010 Renault Clio RenaultSPORT 200 Cup 20th Anniversary Edition - #19 of 30 - The French Connection...
      2004 Volkswagen Golf R32 MkIV - #044 of 200 - Gone But Not Forgotten...
      "Racing is life; Anything that happens before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen -=-=- "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Unknown

      Comment


      • #4
        I have a 08dsg with about 8000kays on the clock. I am getting about 11-12lts/100kays. I do about 50/50 city/highway with the occasional redline. On long trips it gets to about 9-9.5lts/100kays. Not bad i think for a 3.2lts.

        Comment


        • #5
          Have a DSG MY08.

          Currently have completed 9300kms. Average so far has been 9.6l/100km
          Usually get about 560 - 580km per tank...mostly freeway and local (suburban stuff). Wife drives the car carefully...I have fun.

          On a long country run...have seen an average in the middle 8's (l/100km) at the posted limit (100 - 120km/h)
          MY16 Touareg 4.2Lt V8 TDI/Pure White LED lightbox/REDARC Brake Controller/ Racechip/iDrive Throttle controller
          2008 GOLF .:R32/5DR DBPE DSG/SUNROOF/RNS510/PRIVACY TINT/CONTI SC3s/MILLTEK CATBACK NON-RES/9W2 BT/"MYR-032"

          Comment


          • #6
            i was lucky to get 425km from a full tank, 5door Dsg, with coldair intake
            2014 Audi Q5 Quattro 2.0TDI H&R springs (Vossen VF 20" wheels on the way)
            2013 Skoda Fabia vRS Black KW V1 coilovers, CAI Tuned by TMC Motorsport

            Comment


            • #7
              I guess it all comes down to how you drive it. If I had mine stuck in S all the time it would be in the high 12's. I live in Sydney and do a reasonable amount of city driving with a little mix of highway and I'm also around the 9.6l/100 after 15k.

              I don't often go crazy in the car but from a set of lights it's not often a car gets away quicker than I do (unless it's a jerkoff thinking I'm trying to drag him...) so under 10's is reasonably achievable.

              Comment


              • #8
                Its states on the spec. sheet that Ron 98 fuel. Would Ron 95 do any damage?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by taz_435 View Post
                  Its states on the spec. sheet that Ron 98 fuel. Would Ron 95 do any damage?
                  Possibly not but it would take the edge off performance - especially in the lower rev ranges due to the timing being wound back. Also it would probably use more fuel because you have to put the foot down more for the same performance.

                  I had a gen2 Subaru Liberty (2.5DOHC Auto) that I inherited from my Father. Dad had it for 100,000km & ran 50%ULP & 50% 95Ron. These cars were tuned/designed for 98ron minimum. He used to get 14L/100 & the car was really gutless up to 4000rpm. Running it on 98ron, the economy improved to 11L/100km & it had a lot more pull from the lights.

                  For the $200 a year extra that 98ron might cost, what's the point?

                  On my 1.8T Skoda factory spec is 95ron. I use 98ron because it uses less fuel & therefore is cheaper per km (not much but still cheaper).
                  carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
                  I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by brad View Post
                    Possibly not but it would take the edge off performance - especially in the lower rev ranges due to the timing being wound back. Also it would probably use more fuel because you have to put the foot down more for the same performance.

                    I had a gen2 Subaru Liberty (2.5DOHC Auto) that I inherited from my Father. Dad had it for 100,000km & ran 50%ULP & 50% 95Ron. These cars were tuned/designed for 98ron minimum. He used to get 14L/100 & the car was really gutless up to 4000rpm. Running it on 98ron, the economy improved to 11L/100km & it had a lot more pull from the lights.

                    For the $200 a year extra that 98ron might cost, what's the point?

                    On my 1.8T Skoda factory spec is 95ron. I use 98ron because it uses less fuel & therefore is cheaper per km (not much but still cheaper).
                    Sorry...sort of on topic...but I just snorted a gallon of coffee through my nose..... reading all this.

                    You see...my missus measures fuel economy by the days it takes to empty the tank. GOD HELP ME!
                    MY16 Touareg 4.2Lt V8 TDI/Pure White LED lightbox/REDARC Brake Controller/ Racechip/iDrive Throttle controller
                    2008 GOLF .:R32/5DR DBPE DSG/SUNROOF/RNS510/PRIVACY TINT/CONTI SC3s/MILLTEK CATBACK NON-RES/9W2 BT/"MYR-032"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by FJ Steve View Post
                      Sorry...sort of on topic...but I just snorted a gallon of coffee through my nose..... reading all this.

                      You see...my missus measures fuel economy by the days it takes to empty the tank. GOD HELP ME!
                      If you ever saw my fuel consumption spreadsheet...... you'd be wondering where I left my socks & sandals
                      carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
                      I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        If these cars can achieve a combined fuel economy of 10L/100 driving conservatively it pretty much ticks all the boxes for me.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by brad View Post
                          I had a gen2 Subaru Liberty (2.5DOHC Auto) that I inherited from my Father. Dad had it for 100,000km & ran 50%ULP & 50% 95Ron. These cars were tuned/designed for 98ron minimum. He used to get 14L/100 & the car was really gutless up to 4000rpm. Running it on 98ron, the economy improved to 11L/100km & it had a lot more pull from the lights.
                          Interesting... The wife has an Outback and while it's mostly short trip city drives, her consumption is close to 14L/100km. I wonder if her '99 2.5 Auto will like premium better?


                          On another note, as has been said fuel consumption is largely dictated by how you drive, although it's good to understand what the 'best' you could get would be. For me in the VR6 I average about 12L/100km and can get down to 8 or so on trips, but it's all about how I drive it (For reference I only use BP 98 in the VR6 and 91 in the Outback)


                          This then leads to the next question, how much difference can it make... well being anal like I sometimes am I whipped out Excel and put together a little spreadsheet and calculated a few things.

                          Lets start with some assumptions:

                          You travel 10,000km per year
                          Premium ( 98 ) fuel is 20c a litre more expensive than 91
                          Your fuel economy DOES NOT improve or get worse with different fuels.

                          At 10L/100km it would cost you $200 per year more to run 98.
                          At 15L/100km it would cost you $300 per year more to run 98.

                          As the margin between the two reduces of course this becomes less. Further, if your economy gets better by about 1.7L/100/km you will break even...



                          So IF going from 91 to 98 dropped fuel consumption from 14 to 11L/100km you are actually $242 a year better off on the premium

                          ...I need to get out more

                          If it has an engine or heartbeat it's going to cost you.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            i do 11.8l/100 with highway and city combined.....i recon that not too bad for a 4Motion 3.2V6...
                            Blk - R32

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Mine is now up to 18,000 kms and has averaged 10.1 lt/100 kms since the day we took delivery. Most of the driving is suburban (but not stop start).

                              Quite economical if you keep your foot out of it.
                              MY08 R32, DSG, Sunroof, RNS510
                              MY11 Audi Q5 3.0 TDI

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X