Originally posted by Doug VeeDub
View Post
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is the stock MK6 GTI quicker than 6.9s 0-100(DSG)??
Collapse
X
-
So it starts recording as soon as you start moving? Isn't there a delay in a DSG equipped car?Originally posted by Doug VeeDub View PostNo that's using the Performance Box (GPS based) so very accurate, same as motoring mags use. It measures exactly 0-100 not relying on reflexes to stop a watch as 100 passes.
For the record, speedo indicates 107 at GPS 100km/h.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pologti18t View Post.... Isn't there a delay in a DSG equipped car?Originally posted by coreying View PostNot if you do the accelerator tap...I'm slightly confused. How does the "accelerator tap" work when you are already on the accelerator (using Launch Control) ? And isn't the DSG "takeoff delay" eliminated when using LC ? (that's what I'd expect, as you would use LC when wanting a "max attack" take off)Originally posted by Doug VeeDub View Post..... Did nothing special, revved to about 2800rpm then released the brake and held it flat.2017 MY18 Golf R 7.5 Wolfsburg wagon (boring white) delivered 21 Sep 2017, 2008 Octavia vRS wagon 2.0 TFSI 6M (bright yellow), 2006 T5 Transporter van 2.5 TDI 6M (gone but not forgotten).
Comment
-
Yeah using LC, already on accelerator so no "tap" possible. No delay to speak of using LC, launches pretty hard.Originally posted by gregozedobe View PostI'm slightly confused. How does the "accelerator tap" work when you are already on the accelerator (using Launch Control) ? And isn't the DSG "takeoff delay" eliminated when using LC ? (that's what I'd expect, as you would use LC when wanting a "max attack" take off)2010 Golf GTi 5 door, DSG, 18" Detroits, MDI, BT
2010 BMW X5 xDrive 30d
1969 Datsun 1600 club race car 13B bridgeport 203 rwhp
Comment
-
Yeah - sorry, you can't use the tap when on the launch control. The tap (which engages the clutch for 2 seconds) is able to be used in every day drivingOriginally posted by gregozedobe View PostI'm slightly confused. How does the "accelerator tap" work when you are already on the accelerator (using Launch Control) ? And isn't the DSG "takeoff delay" eliminated when using LC ? (that's what I'd expect, as you would use LC when wanting a "max attack" take off)
Comment
-
Actual Acceleration - GTI
Hi all,
My apologies for posting this on two fronts: a) I did search extensively through the forum to see if I could find a similar post, but couldn't really, and b) I'm somewhat of a noob =)
On that note, I know it's a hard question to answer as there are alot of factors to consider, but is the claimed 6.9s 0-100km/h fairly accurate? Anyone know what those stats are based on? 98 RON? Weight in the car? Base model with no options? (assume things like a sunroof add quite a bit of weight).
What's the best time you've been able to get in the stock version?
Not looking at an APR, and coming from a Suzuki Swift, 6.9s seems like I'm in a rocket ship, so it's plenty fast!! Just wondering what the little 2.0 is capable of.
Thanks alot!!!! Any my apologies if this has been posted already!Scirocco R - Candy White / DSG / Panoramic Roof / RNS510
Mods - HPA ECU & DSG Stage 2 / VWR Racing Intake / Akrapovic Slip-On Titanium Tips / Milltek DP / HPA Mounts / Superpro LCA / H&R Sport Springs / VMR V710 19x8.5 / Michelin PSS 255-35
Comment
-
I havent actually timed it or anything (i've been having 0-100 runs just for the feeling), but all i know is that it's way faster than 6.9 secs. Im guessing in between 5 ~ 6 secs| GTI | Red | 3 dr|
If anyone needs a new computer please visit this website http://compulse.yolasite.com/ . Guaranteed cheapest in Brisbane.
Comment
-
It has been posted before, but I'm not sure if it's in a thread specifically titled as such.
Firstly, 6.9 is not accurate! But in a good way. People can get the GTI to go from 0 to 100 in 6.5 and even better. Having the DSG version helps because it's far more consistent than the manual, and most people aren't Michael Schumacher (or you know... some race driver that still uses a traditional manual gearbox...).
With the APR Stage I and II you can get below 6 seconds quite easily, although launching quickly gets harder the more power you have - although they're still easy to drive 'normally'.
Comment
-
coreying: your coments don't surprise me. My gut feeling is that VW's stated power and performance figures on the 118TSI are also quite conservative. Now that I've passed 1000km of gentle-ish driving to run it in and given it full pelt a couple of times, it feels a lot closer to my old car (which would do 0-100 in ~ 6.8 secs) than I was expecting it to, given that it's the "non-performance" variant of the Golf.
AznGti: it's actually quite difficult to launch a front-wheel-drive car below 6 seconds (though perhaps the DSG's launch control helps?), and you'd be wanting closer to 200kW than 150kW to get near that speed.Golf 118 TSI DSG, white with sports pack.
Comment
-
Motor Magazine used a v-box to test a new GTI with DSG: 0-100 in 6.52, and 400m in 14.58. This was a car running 17" rims, with ACC and a few other options from memory. (It out-accelerated a manual Mazda3 MPS to 100km/h and over the quarter in that test, too.) In the December 2009 issue I believe.
As Corey says, mid 6s for a stocker is well and truly achievable. After driving a Swift, you won't know what hit you.
2008 MkV Volkswagen Golf R32 DSG
2005 MkV Volkswagen Golf 2.0 FSI Auto
Sold: 2015 8V Audi S3 Sedan Manual
Sold: 2010 MkVI Volkswagen Golf GTI DSG
Comment
-
Originally posted by cameronp View Postcoreying: your coments don't surprise me. My gut feeling is that VW's stated power and performance figures on the 118TSI are also quite conservative. Now that I've passed 1000km of gentle-ish driving to run it in and given it full pelt a couple of times, it feels a lot closer to my old car (which would do 0-100 in ~ 6.8 secs) than I was expecting it to, given that it's the "non-performance" variant of the Golf.
AznGti: it's actually quite difficult to launch a front-wheel-drive car below 6 seconds (though perhaps the DSG's launch control helps?), and you'd be wanting closer to 200kW than 150kW to get near that speed.
cameronp: Im a bit of a newb at cars, im still learning =D. but yeh, its just the feeling that i get, i thought the time would be approx about 5.8, 5.9 or 6.0 seconds. Thanks for the information though.| GTI | Red | 3 dr|
If anyone needs a new computer please visit this website http://compulse.yolasite.com/ . Guaranteed cheapest in Brisbane.
Comment
-
Thanks for the info all! Too much knowledge in this place, we should get VW to build a new car with our specs on it..haha.
I've got a manual. Decent shifter, but for sure no F1 driver. Understood it will be a bit slower. Regardless, as you said, I'm moving from a Swift S (which is just the base 75kW engine)...so essentially I feel like I'm moving to a Veyron...which is getting delivered next week btw
and yes, I would give up both my wife and first born (whenever that comes) for a Veyron...I pray she doesn't read these forumsScirocco R - Candy White / DSG / Panoramic Roof / RNS510
Mods - HPA ECU & DSG Stage 2 / VWR Racing Intake / Akrapovic Slip-On Titanium Tips / Milltek DP / HPA Mounts / Superpro LCA / H&R Sport Springs / VMR V710 19x8.5 / Michelin PSS 255-35
Comment
2025 - Below Forum
Collapse

Comment