Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

8v vs 16v

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    It was up my a.e for most of the drive to Northam... the fact that it was lighter meant he was going just that little bit faster around corners too...

    Originally posted by Mrk_Mickey View Post
    *calls out to Runamuk* OI!

    Somehow I don't think he'll hear me from NSW...
    Last edited by gtimk5; 05-08-2008, 03:30 PM.
    RIP Ruby Thunder (1994 VR6), now driving the GF's MK IV 1.6

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by peedman View Post
      In a mk3 an 8v just isnt as fun to drive as a 16v full stop.
      Bah biased anti - 8v person Is yours running yet btw?

      Just slam in a 1.8t wouldn't cost alot more than a fan dangle 16v either...
      80,000km 1997 MK3 VR6 manual for sale - www.vwwatercooled.org.au/forums/f23/80-000km-1997-manual-vr6-nsw-sydney-67658.html

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Golf Houso View Post
        Bah biased anti - 8v person Is yours running yet btw?

        Just slam in a 1.8t wouldn't cost alot more than a fan dangle 16v either...
        wouldn't cost my more than a really really really fandangle 16V...

        On a BFYB scale, 16V doesn't add up for me. a 1K premium for like 10 HP? no thanks.

        In an all out tuning battle 16V wins hands down, because, it's more tuneable, because it's a 16V


        i like volkswagens
        My blog: http://garagefiftythree.blogspot.com.au/

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by runamuk View Post
          It was up my a.e for most of the drive to Northam... the fact that it was lighter meant he was going just that little bit faster around corners too...
          Yeah, that's what I thought.

          Still, nowhere near as SEXYTAIIME sound as a VR. Hehehe
          Mrk Detailing, premium automotive detailing. Paint correction/protection specialist. PM me

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Brisben View Post
            Well then you have missed a cog mate
            ... ?!

            1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Golf Houso View Post
              Can your 16v start off in 3rd ?
              A 16v has more torque than an 8v from idle (quite significantly in fact!!)...

              1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Valver. View Post
                A 16v has more torque than an 8v from idle (quite significantly in fact!!)...
                i was saving that one for later lol
                Velly
                '91 2.0 8v GTI

                Originally posted by DubSteve
                I have wood thinking about you

                Comment


                • #38
                  so then which is the best 16v? i mean all things considered, ie. including mild headwork and a mild road cam. also, is it possible to mechanically turbocharge k-jet?
                  87' MK2 GTI
                  13' MK7 TDI

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    The best one is in the lightest car
                    Mrk Detailing, premium automotive detailing. Paint correction/protection specialist. PM me

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Valver. View Post
                      ... ?!
                      Sorted that one out, A 16v only has one sprocket as somone thought otherwise.
                      All good and not a lot of difference pricewise to replace a cambelt as I originally stated. Only difference would be the price of the belt. Neglible, and they run the GLD belt tensioner on all the earlier twin cams.
                      Cheers, Andrew
                      Par 6 Golf GTI. Coilovers, BBS CH Wheels, APR'd
                      Caddy van 05/07 (colourcoded) (BRIGHT! orange!) coilovers, Konis 18in. wheels, Oettinger tuned

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Golf Houso View Post
                        Just slam in a 1.8t wouldn't cost alot more than a fan dangle 16v either...
                        You are an idiot if you believe this.

                        The 20VT engines are more to buy and will need a $2500 minimum aftermarket computer to run.
                        If you got an ABF 16v and loom and ecu, its plug and play into a Mk3 and would cost less than half.
                        You wouldnt go as fast as a 20V, but you would spend a lot less.

                        Perhaps if you spent less time on the net and more time having experience with cars, you might know what you are talking about.
                        sigpic Camden GTI Performance. VW / AUDI Specialists
                        All Mechanical Work, Log book Servicing, New and used Parts and Imports
                        19-20/6 Badgally Road, Campbelltown, 2560
                        02 4627 3072 or 0423 051737 www.camdengti.com

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I picked up a whole mk4 gti wreck over 2years ago for $5k . Im sure you could get one for less today . You dont need to run an aftermarket computer , you can use the standard wiring harness , if its a mk1 or 2 it would make sense to swap the gearbox as well and also the dash .
                          A 16V maybe cheaper , but reality is , these are old engines now , and the price to install a 16V to get that 110 or so KW you could modify the 8V , and if you want power your better off doing the 1.8t conversion .

                          Thats my 2c
                          Bug_racer supports the rebellion of the euro revolution

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by jayjay View Post
                            so then which is the best 16v? i mean all things considered, ie. including mild headwork and a mild road cam. also, is it possible to mechanically turbocharge k-jet?
                            It's possible, but you need the K-jet off a porsche 933 era 911 turbo to do it. Practically, it'd be cheaper to go aftermarket and probably more beneficial too, something like a Mircotech LXT8 should do the trick.
                            Last edited by Jarred; 06-08-2008, 11:36 AM.


                            i like volkswagens
                            My blog: http://garagefiftythree.blogspot.com.au/

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Jarred View Post
                              It's possible, but you need the K-jet off a porsche 933 era 911 turbo to do it. Practically, it'd be cheaper to go aftermarket and possibly more beneficial too, something like a Mircotech LXT8 should do the trick.
                              SAAB is another company that used k-basic 0n turbo motors, only until they could come up with something better
                              Its only viable to keep k-jet running on 2nd parts (all at least 20 yrs old), as it costs around $1500 to reco a system & a lot more using new parts if you can still get them

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                how about volvo? you know peter jones' set up with his DIY cold air intake? apparently he used a volvo airbox, and theoretically, couldn't i run a turbo without a computer?

                                or am i just talking out of my ass? thanks for input though guys
                                87' MK2 GTI
                                13' MK7 TDI

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X