Not by much... or at least this guys wasnt.
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
8v vs 16v
Collapse
X
-
I don't imagine it would have been, and thats why its its treated in almost as the same way as the VR6 in a three i.e. respected with a considerable following... Its still no 1.8T mind you.Originally posted by MattyT View PostNot by much... or at least this guys wasnt.80,000km 1997 MK3 VR6 manual for sale - www.vwwatercooled.org.au/forums/f23/80-000km-1997-manual-vr6-nsw-sydney-67658.html
Comment
-
Can your 16v start off in 3rdOriginally posted by velly_16v_cab View Postall down to the weight thing as standard.
still, both are better than an 8v lol
?
80,000km 1997 MK3 VR6 manual for sale - www.vwwatercooled.org.au/forums/f23/80-000km-1997-manual-vr6-nsw-sydney-67658.html
Comment
-
Well then you have missed a cog mate. Plus the belt is more expensive.Originally posted by gtimk5 View PostCambelt change on a 16v is no different to an 8v!!
This is getting funny.
I prefer 16v myself but like the MK1 more and the conversion isn't worth the dollars as the difference doesn't justify the cost.
So I love 16v but happy with an 8v mk1.Last edited by Brisben; 05-08-2008, 01:52 PM.1993 MK1 CAB ! Work in Progress........
Comment
2025 - Below Forum
Collapse


Comment