Originally posted by Preen59
View Post
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
1 of 2
<
>
Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)
Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
2 of 2
<
>
Welcome to the new look VWWatercooled
After much work and little sleep there is a new version of the forums running on more powerful and recent hardware as well as an upgraded software platform.
Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.
Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.

The new forum software is an upgraded version of what came before, it's mostly the same but also a little different. Hopefully easier to use and more stable than before.
We are learning together here, so please be patient. If you have questions, please post them here. If you have worked something out and can provide an answer,
See more
See less
the Official 16v thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 16v80 View PostAudi A4 btcc touring cars had 2L 16v engines in them 96 on I think,
depending on the year these were either 295 or 305 BHP,
These engines are N/A,
From what i can find out they are basically 6A engines, solid lifters, big cams, throttle bodies, they produce max power at @8500rpm,
In my opinion these are the ultimate 16v engine, imagine this in a stripped mk1/2 gti
sigpic
Mk2 GTI 2 door 1.9l 8v turbo 1st mk2 1st engineered water vw nats 09
Mk1 twin eng twin turb
scirocco gti 2.1l 16v turb 6spd
Audi A4 B5 1.8t
Comment
-
Being the the Official 16v thread thought id ask a question im running a 2.0l 16V (Audi 9A 2.0l bottom end with VW 16v head) im after a new timing belt does anyone have a part number for a timing belt??? (beats taking it off and sending to my parts guy)
Im running K-Jet, lighten fly, custom extractors, altered cam timing and 50mm intake and all it does is spin wheels i put in a locked diff still spins wheels 3rd gear is where i get traction and changes lanes in the processback yard tuning has worked good so far like to dyno it to see some numbers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by revnit View PostBeing the the Official 16v thread thought id ask a question im running a 2.0l 16V (Audi 9A 2.0l bottom end with VW 16v head) im after a new timing belt does anyone have a part number for a timing belt??? (beats taking it off and sending to my parts guy)
Im running K-Jet, lighten fly, custom extractors, altered cam timing and 50mm intake and all it does is spin wheels i put in a locked diff still spins wheels 3rd gear is where i get traction and changes lanes in the processback yard tuning has worked good so far like to dyno it to see some numbers.
not that it matters much but the Audi is 6A not 9A,(9A is passat/corrado)
The part number for the belt is 027 109 119 C (25mm x 1176mm)
I would replace the tensioner aswell, Part number 051 109 243
Hope that helps
IanLast edited by 16v80; 01-08-2008, 09:13 PM.2.0L 16v Audi 80 - Project
3.0L 30v Audi A6 quattro - Daily
Comment
-
Originally posted by aprr32 View Post4 branch Manifolds (Exatractors) make one hell of a difference!
Esp at the top end where a 16v tends to live most of it life.
My mates 2.0 16v GTI Egnineering jetta had a polished and ported standard cast manifold and he was told that will do him. After alot of playing about he later changed it for Ashley manifold and gained 10BHP @ wheels and broke the 190bhp @ flywheel.
He now fits them to all this 16vs builds (he has since built 2 mk1 16v's)
Anyone else fancy 16v header group purchase?
Comment
-
No radial firing order???
APR Tuned | KW Suspension | INA Engineering | Mocal Oil Control |
Website: http://www.tprengineering.com
Email: chris@tprengineering.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by 16v80 View PostThats the same as what I run, (fly, exhaust, timing) except mine has twin 45 Dellorto's, and I use the early ecu, supposed to have a more aggresive timing curve.
IanLots of MK 1 Scirocco's...
If it aint a MK 1 then it must be a donor car ??
Cheers,
Grant...
Comment
-
Originally posted by ausgolfer View PostDo you mean tuned lenghts.
Never heard it put that way. But I imagine they're not just bunged together any lengths.
And YES WHEN AND HOW MUCH??
Oh, and i need a short block 16v one to suit a Mk1..
APR Tuned | KW Suspension | INA Engineering | Mocal Oil Control |
Website: http://www.tprengineering.com
Email: chris@tprengineering.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by velly_16v_cab View Postyou will get that from a STD 1.8 KR valver,
155-160 for a std 2.0 would be ball park, i think Dom is on the right track
You'd be surprised if you put an old, unrebuilt 9a with KR or ABF cams on an engine dyno. Not only are the cams alone not worth a 20bhp+ increase (you don't get that in peak figures moving from PL/9a cams to Schrick 260s), an engine with a quarter of a million kms already won't make its standard output.
Fair enough a lot of the UK cars "have" blaring hp figures, but no one has used a proper engine dyno, and I'm sure if someone was to put a genuine, fresh 160/170/180hp engine in their car, they'd be very surprised.
A 172hp Clio has miles more grunt than some of the VW 16vs I've driven claiming similar outputs - same, too, with the 168hp B16A Honda, which has far less torque. I'd be more inclined to believe a 15 millio dollar factory dyno than "Vince @ Stealth" with regard to how much power my engine had
Not intended to be a blunt post, but if people are to learn from this thread, let's a least be a bit realistic about how much power is reasonably achievable on all but a massive budget
And even so, 16vs are nice to drive for their torque figures, which can be boosted up nicely in the mid-range with tuning... far more important in a road car with sensible gearing and speed limits.
1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels
Comment
-
so basically are you saying a hot 8v can achieve nearly the same amount of HP for less dollars?VW: it aint just a car, its a way of life
There are few things more satisfying in life than finding a solution to a problem and implementing it
My Blog: tinkererstales.blogspot.com.au
Comment
-
Originally posted by GoLfMan View Postso basically are you saying a hot 8v can achieve nearly the same amount of HP for less dollars?
A hot, well setup 1.8/2.0 8v could definitely challenge a higher mileage, standard 9a 16v IMO, yesIt's all a bit subjective still, though!!
EDIT: But tuning the 8v to do so would cost more than a reasonable 16v swap...
1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels
Comment
-
Originally posted by evorobin View Post
I have built a MK1 16V using one of their manifold, that was in 1996 and I don't think the price has gone up since then!!
They don't look like a Supersprint but do the job for less money.
Gavin
Comment
2025 - Below Forum
Collapse
Comment