Just read that the Tiguan 132 engine uses technology (already deployed by Audi) similar to the Miller Cycle which is an old technology and previously used by Mazda, except Audi/VW are not willing to call it the Miller Cycle. Their version (B-Cylce) uses a Turbo charger rather than a super charger. Not sure if that makes any difference to the engine's tuning limits or not.
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tuning Discussion - 132TSI / 162TSI
Collapse
X
-
Long time lurker, who has just joined here ...
Great work jrgti.
A bit of Googling that info turned up VW's New 2.0L Turbo is More Efficient, More Powerful and Runs on Regular Gas » AutoGuide.com News (and other links such as https://media.vw.com/release/1389/ ) (note these links are from a US market perspective which is about to get the Tiguan 2 that non-US markets have had for some time, so the engine being discussed is the engine we already have).
So the 132 is quite a different engine than the Golf GTI engine used in the Tiguan 162 (i.e. while still in the same family (EA888 Gen 3), it is more than just a detuned version, as it has significant changes around camshafts, valves, chain drive, turbo, injectors, cylinder crown, piston head etc etc).
All very interesting!
Note I don't feel that the 132 is in any way inferior to the 162 - it's still got plenty of power, and the torque is amazing (it's like a diesel), while being easier on the gas pump and my wallet.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Hole46 View PostGained 40kw midrange, 30kw peak at all 4 wheels. Cost $950 including before and after dyno.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
How's the drive?
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hole46 View PostGained 40kw midrange, 30kw peak at all 4 wheels. Cost $950 including before and after dyno.
2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline
2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 125TSI Build
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan_3MPS View PostNot too shabby! What about torque gains? Better fuel economy too I would assume, have noticed my new Tiggy likes a drink compared to my old tuned Mk6 GTI.
How's the drive?
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Economy is good, averaged 7.2 on a 1500 km round trip to Taree including battling holiday traffic through Brisbane and Woodburn.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Comment
-
That sounds great!
After our first highway drive yesterday the Mrs (not a car person) said "it doesn't accelerate like the old Golf when rolling, can you get a tune for this to fix that?"
I've taken that comment as permission to do it at my leisure
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by tons View PostA bit of Googling that info turned up VW's New 2.0L Turbo is More Efficient, More Powerful and Runs on Regular Gas » AutoGuide.com News (and other links such as Official Media Site - Volkswagen Media Site ) (note these links are from a US market perspective which is about to get the Tiguan 2 that non-US markets have had for some time, so the engine being discussed is the engine we already have).
So the 132 is quite a different engine than the Golf GTI engine used in the Tiguan 162 (i.e. while still in the same family (EA888 Gen 3), it is more than just a detuned version, as it has significant changes around camshafts, valves, chain drive, turbo, injectors, cylinder crown, piston head etc etc).
I've been told that the reason for VW Aust releasing the Adventure last year was they couldn't get the engines for the 162TSI Highline allocated to our market - which wouldn't have been an issue if it was just a differently tuned 132TSI.
If they want to improve the fuel efficiency in Aust, ditch the auto start/stop feature (not suited to keeping A/C's running in our hot weather) and take a leaf from the 110TSI and drop pots 2&3. I vaguely recall from years ago that some Aussie v8's dropped 4 cylinders when cruising!Last edited by dilbert_rocks; 13-02-2018, 11:51 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ozsko View PostI am puzzled how that is going to improve fuel economy.
1) auto start/stop (I'd expect most people will disable to keep the A/C running, hence no increase in fuel economy)
2) not supplying fuel to 2 of the 4 cylinders as per the Trendline (expect the biggest load on the engine when stopped would be the A/C unit)Last edited by dilbert_rocks; 18-02-2018, 08:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dilbert_rocks View PostYou're missing the rest of my quote where I suggested an alternate option to improve fuel economy when stopped:
1) auto start/stop (I'd expect most people will disable to keep the A/C running, hence no increase in fuel economy)
2) not supplying fuel to 2 of the 4 cylinders as per the Trendline (expect the biggest load on the engine when stopped would be the A/C unit)
Comment
2025 - Below Forum
Collapse
Comment