Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sharkie's TSI Amarok Build

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sharkie
    replied
    Originally posted by Transporter View Post
    I've fitted the same camera to mine, and unless the camera is defective (which I doubt), the image quality is far from the VW RVC as we have in our Tiguans. So, unless you're on a very, very tight budget, do yourself a favour and spend a little bit more and get the VW one.
    I don't know Miro, I am quite happy with the quality of the image, but then I don't have an OEM VW camera to compare to. For my purposes (and probably for most people) I think these are just fine especially since the price is so low .... $100 including shipping compared to at least $400 for an OEM VW lowline camera.

    Leave a comment:


  • Transporter
    replied
    I've fitted the same camera to mine, and unless the camera is defective (which I doubt), the image quality is far from the VW RVC as we have in our Tiguans. So, unless you're on a very, very tight budget, do yourself a favour and spend a little bit more and get the VW one.

    Leave a comment:


  • team_v
    replied
    Got any details on the amarok reverse camera?

    Leave a comment:


  • brad
    replied
    Originally posted by Sharkie View Post
    Mmmmm thinking of fitting this to the rear .....

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10309[/ATTACH]

    Should I?
    Not a fan unless the red exclamation mark could replace the I in TSI.

    I'm not big on badges

    Leave a comment:


  • tigger73
    replied
    Originally posted by Sharkie View Post
    Mmmmm thinking of fitting this to the rear .....

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]10309[/ATTACH]

    Should I?
    Does it have a tune?

    I would take off the TSI and just have the APR of I was going to do it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkie
    replied
    Mmmmm thinking of fitting this to the rear .....

    Click image for larger version

Name:	APR_zps0e835609.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	90.6 KB
ID:	1812093

    Should I?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkie
    replied
    Took me 2 days all up combined with the fog light wiring, but finished the RVC install

    Very happy with the result .... cost $99 including shipping !

    Click image for larger version

Name:	RVCDone_zpsbeecad68.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	108.9 KB
ID:	1812092

    The RVC comes with all wiring, coding instructions and a plug that fits straight into the RNS510.

    Leave a comment:


  • team_v
    replied
    Nice work Sharkie.
    Now you just need to replace the bulbs with LED's haha.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkie
    replied
    Finally wired up the front fogs to the VW OEM switch today ....

    Went from this:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	HLSwitchstd_zpsb9bcdeda.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	48.8 KB
ID:	1809268

    To this:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	HLSwitchChrome_zps587f879f.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	52.1 KB
ID:	1809269

    And it works!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guy_H
    replied
    TSI Amarok has great potential.

    Because its mounted longitudinally in a big engine bay it has an extremely well flowing intake / exhaust / intercooler standard, its potential power will be far greater than when its mounted sideways in an engine bay on a Golf or Tiguan!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkie
    replied
    Power curve of the TSI Amarok stock is very similar to the 125/132TSI Tiguans ..... only with more torque

    Leave a comment:


  • team_v
    replied
    Originally posted by Sharkie View Post
    Well ........ Discovered this week that the TSI Amarok, rated by VW at 118kw, actually makes more power on a dyno than the 132kw BiTDI ......

    125kw (118TSI) > 121kw (132TDI) > 110kw (120TDI) at the hubs on a DynaPack dyno ......

    Obviously drivetrain losses may be slightly different but the actual power getting to road certainly explains why the 118 TSI has been tested over 1s quicker to 100km/h than the 132TDI
    Interesting.
    Hope that means the development of a tune for these will see big results.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sharkie
    replied
    Well ........ Discovered this week that the TSI Amarok, rated by VW at 118kw, actually makes more power on a dyno than the 132kw BiTDI ......

    125kw (118TSI) > 121kw (132TDI) > 110kw (120TDI) at the hubs on a DynaPack dyno ......

    Obviously drivetrain losses may be slightly different but the actual power getting to road certainly explains why the 118 TSI has been tested over 1s quicker to 100km/h than the 132TDI
    Last edited by Sharkie; 22-05-2014, 10:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • VWindahouse
    replied
    Killing it Sharkie, love your work mate!

    Leave a comment:


  • team_v
    replied
    Keen to hear how the upgrade path goes.
    We do have a coupld of spots spare at the QR Happy Laps still.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X