VW Service Centre hit my car

[erict]

First post here and looking for some advice. I'll try keep the story as short as possible.

I had my car serviced at VW on Tuesday. Went to pick it up and found it kissing the rear end of a Tarago. Damage to the front bumper and sensors. They were very helpful and advised they will be bearing the costs of repair.

Today they called and said that after checking the video footage they could see that the mechanic parked the car fine at first, then it later rolled forward (when I picked up the car on Tuesday the e-brake was disengaged but selector was in park). Now they are telling me that there is a problem with the transmission and that I'm liable...

I always engage the parking brake before I leave my car, so I can't say with absolute certainty that this problem didn't exist prior to handing the car over for service, however I believe it's more likely that this "transmission problem" arose after my car was left with the parking brake off. It was parked on a slight decline which would have placed extra pressure on the parking pawl, and considering it's the only thing stopping the car from rolling now, it makes sense to me that the transmission issue arose around this time.

I'm no expert with DSGs (or traditional autos for that matter), but it's common sense to engage the parking brake along with putting the selector in park regardless of how flat the surface is. It's written in the bloody manual.

I was seeking direct compensation (before they told me about the transmission thing) because it has genuinely affected my work and mood (which again affects my work) but they're pushing back hard. Nothing I didn't expect, but now they're trying to put the blame on me for the broken transmission as well so the inconvenience has grown. I'll be fighting this with them to get the direct compensation, as well as the transmission work done on their dollar.

If there's any knowledge or information around DSGs, parking brakes, VWs rolling, etc. that you can share I'd greatly appreciate it. I don't think it's fair for them to 'win'. The service manager has claimed that he is going above and beyond to make good of the inconvenience caused by fixing the car and giving a loan car. That is standard procedure in all insurance claims. It's not okay for him to be leveraging that as a mode of compensation.

I drive a 2014 Golf 90kw 1.4TSI

Apologies if this post isn't in the right space - I've only just joined.

Pics - Imgur: The magic of the Internet

[Umai Naa!!]

Car will roll before it engages with the parking pawl in the transmission, but not more than a few inches at most. Test it yourself in a safe area, to be sure.

Still, the technician should have engaged the park brake, and perhaps not parked so close to the other car. If you're getting nowhere with the service department, escalate it to the general manager and dealer principal.

Good luck with it.

[erict]

Thanks for the response mate.

I haven't seen the footage so not sure how close he parked it and how far it rolled. I will watch it when I take my car in.

I was thinking the same as you regarding escalation. I'm giving it one more conversation with the service manager. If there's no progress I'll be escalating it.

Cheers,
Eric

PS I've added pics to the post if you're curious

[Ozsko]

It is the driver's responsibility to secure the car in all ways before leaving it, full stop and no argument and part of the legislation covering the road code. They are trying it on to see if you will take responsibility and it sounds like some bright young thing has thought it up. I would watch the video then explain the facts to the service manager because it proves the technician did not secure the car. I bet they regret showing it to you in the end.

[Boony]

Still, the technician should have engaged the park brake.

Ditto to this, and you can ask if the technician knows how to drive. The car is so far from the footpath it's going into the next lane!

[doc_777]

I’m pretty sure the owners manual says to apply the parking brake. If the technician didn’t, then he was not using the vehicle according to manufacturer recommendations.

[Ozsko]

Forget what it says in the manual, the overriding legislation says it all. Call the local police station and they will tell you the same thing.

[doc_777]

Forget what it says in the manual, the overriding legislation says it all. Call the local police station and they will tell you the same thing.

and which legislation would that be?

[Ozsko]

The legislation that governs car use whatever that is.

[doc_777]

The legislation that governs car use whatever that is.

oh, that one. Uh huh.

[GolfAus]

NSW legislation

Rule 213 (2)
2) Before leaving the vehicle, the driver must apply the parking brake effectively or, if weather conditions (for example, snow) would prevent the effective operation of the parking brake, effectively restrain the motor vehicle’s movement in another way.

Also photos look like it’s parked on a road. If that’s the case then
NSW legislation

208 (5)
If the driver does not park in a parking bay, the driver must position the vehicle at least 1 metre from the closest point of any vehicle in front of it and any vehicle behind it.


whoops, just saw you were from Vic but the road rules in these instances are the same
http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Do...authorised.pdf

get a copy of the video first, even if you film their screen before stating any of this or else they may claim the car in front reversed into you

[Guest001]

NSW legislation

Rule 213 (2)
2) Before leaving the vehicle, the driver must apply the parking brake effectively or, if weather conditions (for example, snow) would prevent the effective operation of the parking brake, effectively restrain the motor vehicle’s movement in another way.

Also photos look like it’s parked on a road. If that’s the case then
NSW legislation

208 (5)
If the driver does not park in a parking bay, the driver must position the vehicle at least 1 metre from the closest point of any vehicle in front of it and any vehicle behind it.


whoops, just saw you were from Vic but the road rules in these instances are the same
http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Do...authorised.pdf

get a copy of the video first, even if you film their screen before stating any of this or else they may claim the car in front reversed into you

It ran forward into the van which incidentally looks like its parked across a driveway

[doc_777]

NSW legislation

Rule 213 (2)
2) Before leaving the vehicle, the driver must apply the parking brake effectively or, if weather conditions (for example, snow) would prevent the effective operation of the parking brake, effectively restrain the motor vehicle’s movement in another way.

Also photos look like it’s parked on a road. If that’s the case then
NSW legislation

208 (5)
If the driver does not park in a parking bay, the driver must position the vehicle at least 1 metre from the closest point of any vehicle in front of it and any vehicle behind it.


whoops, just saw you were from Vic but the road rules in these instances are the same
http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Do...authorised.pdf

get a copy of the video first, even if you film their screen before stating any of this or else they may claim the car in front reversed into you

that effort deserves thumbs up! Not just a lazy reference, something useful. Cheers

[GolfAus]

that effort deserves thumbs up! Not just a lazy reference, something useful. Cheers

Thanks, cheers to a fellow Tassie Wolfsburg owner!

[doc_777]

Thanks, cheers to a fellow Tassie Wolfsburg owner!

these days, I think I would prefer one like yours instead of mine. Nothing at all wrong with the Passat, I just feel like it would be fun to own a type R wagon