Stop buying extended warranty and worrying about 'contracts' that limit warranty.
1. Under Australian consumer law, there is no minimum or maximum time for warranty, it rests on the type of good and what is a reasonable time a good should last. For example, given that a car is replaced every 6-7 years, it is reasonable for a consumer to expect that car to be free of manufacturing defects for 6-7 years.
2. A seller is obligated to fix faults regardless of time.
3. If they refuse, simply lodge a case in the small claims court making the point in 1. and 2., you are pretty much certain to get a judgement in favour. this only costs $100ish
If you read the many judgements from small claims, they have always ruled in favour of the consumer.
for example, a case where a flat screen TV died in the 3rd year, the warranty was for 2 years, the court made the case that a TV should last 6-7 years since that is the average time people replace them, and as such, the seller had to either replace, repair or refund 4/7 of the price paid (as the buyer only got 3 years of use from what should have beeen 7).
hence when buying new goods, i never buy warranty, you are already protected from faults under consumer law.
consumer law agencies have already said many times, extended warranty is a waste of money, and that limits to warranty is not fool proof, cosnumer law always overrides attempts to limit warranty.
1. Under Australian consumer law, there is no minimum or maximum time for warranty, it rests on the type of good and what is a reasonable time a good should last. For example, given that a car is replaced every 6-7 years, it is reasonable for a consumer to expect that car to be free of manufacturing defects for 6-7 years.
2. A seller is obligated to fix faults regardless of time.
3. If they refuse, simply lodge a case in the small claims court making the point in 1. and 2., you are pretty much certain to get a judgement in favour. this only costs $100ish
If you read the many judgements from small claims, they have always ruled in favour of the consumer.
for example, a case where a flat screen TV died in the 3rd year, the warranty was for 2 years, the court made the case that a TV should last 6-7 years since that is the average time people replace them, and as such, the seller had to either replace, repair or refund 4/7 of the price paid (as the buyer only got 3 years of use from what should have beeen 7).
hence when buying new goods, i never buy warranty, you are already protected from faults under consumer law.
consumer law agencies have already said many times, extended warranty is a waste of money, and that limits to warranty is not fool proof, cosnumer law always overrides attempts to limit warranty.
Comment