Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

8v vs 16v

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mrk_Mickey
    replied
    The best one is in the lightest car

    Leave a comment:


  • jayjay
    replied
    so then which is the best 16v? i mean all things considered, ie. including mild headwork and a mild road cam. also, is it possible to mechanically turbocharge k-jet?

    Leave a comment:


  • velly_16v_cab
    replied
    Originally posted by Valver. View Post
    A 16v has more torque than an 8v from idle (quite significantly in fact!!)...
    i was saving that one for later lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Valver.
    replied
    Originally posted by Golf Houso View Post
    Can your 16v start off in 3rd ?
    A 16v has more torque than an 8v from idle (quite significantly in fact!!)...

    Leave a comment:


  • Valver.
    replied
    Originally posted by Brisben View Post
    Well then you have missed a cog mate
    ... ?!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrk_Mickey
    replied
    Originally posted by runamuk View Post
    It was up my a.e for most of the drive to Northam... the fact that it was lighter meant he was going just that little bit faster around corners too...
    Yeah, that's what I thought.

    Still, nowhere near as SEXYTAIIME sound as a VR. Hehehe

    Leave a comment:


  • Jarred
    replied
    Originally posted by Golf Houso View Post
    Bah biased anti - 8v person Is yours running yet btw?

    Just slam in a 1.8t wouldn't cost alot more than a fan dangle 16v either...
    wouldn't cost my more than a really really really fandangle 16V...

    On a BFYB scale, 16V doesn't add up for me. a 1K premium for like 10 HP? no thanks.

    In an all out tuning battle 16V wins hands down, because, it's more tuneable, because it's a 16V

    Leave a comment:


  • Golf Houso
    replied
    Originally posted by peedman View Post
    In a mk3 an 8v just isnt as fun to drive as a 16v full stop.
    Bah biased anti - 8v person Is yours running yet btw?

    Just slam in a 1.8t wouldn't cost alot more than a fan dangle 16v either...

    Leave a comment:


  • runamuk
    replied
    It was up my a.e for most of the drive to Northam... the fact that it was lighter meant he was going just that little bit faster around corners too...

    Originally posted by Mrk_Mickey View Post
    *calls out to Runamuk* OI!

    Somehow I don't think he'll hear me from NSW...
    Last edited by gtimk5; 05-08-2008, 03:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • peedman
    replied
    In a mk3 an 8v just isnt as fun to drive as a 16v full stop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brisben
    replied
    Originally posted by velly_16v_cab View Post
    its a cheap conversion in the uk lol

    I know, I came from there a year ago...

    I still buy stuff from ebay UK for my mk1....Loads of stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • velly_16v_cab
    replied
    its a cheap conversion in the uk lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Brisben
    replied
    Originally posted by gtimk5 View Post
    Cambelt change on a 16v is no different to an 8v!!
    Well then you have missed a cog mate. Plus the belt is more expensive.

    This is getting funny.

    I prefer 16v myself but like the MK1 more and the conversion isn't worth the dollars as the difference doesn't justify the cost.

    So I love 16v but happy with an 8v mk1.
    Last edited by Brisben; 05-08-2008, 01:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • velly_16v_cab
    replied
    my last cam belt was cheap, it was the tensioner that cost the bucks!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • gtimk5
    replied
    Cambelt change on a 16v is no different to an 8v!!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X