If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed, registering will remove the in post advertisements. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This means you should apply for your renewal now to avoid any disruptions to your membership whilst the renewal process is taking place! NOTE: If you have an auto renewing subscription this will happen automatically.
I know cars using a rear axle beam don't cause more negative camber as you lower the car, but it will make the wheels sit further towards the front due to the action of the beam (is that positive or negative castor?). However, if you want to generate camber, you can use camber shims. They bolt up between the stub axle and axle beam.
It's unnoticeable in the picture but in extreme cases, you can physically see that the bottom of the shim is thicker than the top, thus allowing your tyres to sit on an angle. Purely for racing or show-only purposes as you can imagine.
I dont understand you ray,you keep trying to do things to a passat that will either make it look like a beemer or a skyline. my suggestion is sell the car and buy somehing you really want.much cheaper in the long run.
do our VW's camber in at the rear the more you lower it?
wen you lower a bmw or commodore, the rears camber in so it doesnt hit the rim. does our VAG cars do the same??
lol you make it sound like a feature but it's really a BAD thing - Will wear through your tyres like you wouldn't believe and cause the car to handle like ****.
cars like commodores with IRS end up with lots of neg on the rear when they are low because of the angle that the rear wishbones rotate through to get to that position.... its not by design that the tops of the wheels end up with more clearance. generally anyone who does this on a commodore then eventually gets a camber kit put in so that they have less neg.
im infamiliar with the passat rear suspension (on the new passats atleast) but i trailing arm golf suspension allows little change in alignment with ride height, which is nice.
i would suspect that like bmw's and audis with IRS, there is much less transition to neg camber on th rear than the notorious commodore.
'07 Touareg V6 TDI with air suspension
'98 Mk3 Cabriolet 2.0 8V
'99 A4 Quattro 1.8T
On a FWD passat, they've got rear trailing arms - so you end up with the wheels a little bit further back.
If you have a double wishbone rear set up, lowering wouldn't change the camber.
I think even on the front of the passat there's no change in the camber the lower you go. It would - I think - set the wheels out a little bit further.
In both cases on the passat the difference is minimal.
I reckon with top control arms (like the passat) it would have the effect of moving the wheel through a vertical plane. Assuming the car is lowered to the upper limit of the vertical range of movement a little of either +ve or -ve camber would result under compression.
You could work out the locus that the movement traces on a piece of paper & a pair of compasses. Frankly, CBF.
Comment