Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)

Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
2 of 2 < >

Welcome to the new look VWWatercooled

After much work and little sleep there is a new version of the forums running on more powerful and recent hardware as well as an upgraded software platform.

Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.

The new forum software is an upgraded version of what came before, it's mostly the same but also a little different. Hopefully easier to use and more stable than before. We are learning together here, so please be patient. If you have questions, please post them here. If you have worked something out and can provide an answer,
See more
See less

Intake Restrictions tested

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    What do people with otherwise stock Pogs think about the intake? Is there an effect, or does it require chip tune to be noticeable?

    The increase in richness reflects the ECU intervening to protect the cat. It seems to be a common feature in dyno runs for all the Pogs I've seen.
    2015 White German SUV
    2013 White German hatch
    2011 Silver French hot hatch
    2008 TR Golf GT TDI DSG

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by GT3 View Post
      Hey Al, brilliant R&D.

      You'd be interested to know that I dynoed my car at the exact same place as you, and got the exact same result (120atw), and that was with a BMC CDA! I also got the dip in AFR (bit too rich) which I'm assuming is a result of the ECU responding to the increased air flow (as well it injecting more fuel).
      So this is all consistent. When I installed a FMIC, that's when the AFR sorted itself out (see thread below, includes dyno with CDA, then FMIC).

      http://www.vwwatercooled.org.au/newf...ead.php?t=6965
      Hey...Neil? I spoke to you on the phone from Volkspower a few weeks back!
      Yep pretty good result from that FMIC, I was talking to Dean about it, surprised both of us. Would seem to indicate that the standard intercooler is pretty restrictive too, the only thing we could think of that would result in that jump in power. All good stuff to know!

      Comment


      • #48
        Ok. ...BUT, when I added a Forge TIP after that, the dyno showed virtually no change (1 kw). Based on your research, I wonder whether the MAF filter has something to do with that?

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by awestonvp View Post
          And I do notice it on the road - just seems a bit sweeter and stronger from 3000 on up, and more enthusiastic over 5000 which is real nice.
          Originally posted by Timbo View Post
          What do people with otherwise stock Pogs think about the intake? Is there an effect, or does it require chip tune to be noticeable?
          Timbo Al's words above show exactly how mine feels and im not chipped. I definitely felt it to although i thought it was my imagineation (you know the placebo affect) about it being more enthusiastic over 5000 as al put it but as im not the only one to think this my initial thoughts are confirmed. Im glad that the group buy was worth it for those who joined in.
          For Sale 2006 VW Polo GTI
          Have a Look
          CUSTOM CODE
          Phase 2

          Comment


          • #50
            Well done, the results and R&D on the mod speak for themselves.
            Last edited by GT3; 26-08-2007, 08:05 PM.

            Comment


            • #51
              hi all - were are you sourcing the seat intake from?

              Comment


              • #52
                On my non-chipped car i feel that it doesn't drop off as much above 5000 rpm with the SEAT intake installed. Just feels like it's level now.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by jayzee75 View Post
                  hi all - were are you sourcing the seat intake from?
                  We did a group buy a few months back. Shaneth organised it... got them from the uk i think. He'll have all the details.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Check with Harding Performance they had some too a few months back.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      intake restrictions

                      Ive bought a few things through guy at harding performance

                      always full of friendly advice, shipping was always fast and products always packaged well out of harms way.

                      1300 730 949 ask for Guy
                      GTI. Leather.
                      tint,Eibach pro-kit,Whiteline adjustable swaybars,Forge s/brace,BMC,Forge T.I.P & D.V, Cupra R, APR. EBC & 3''dump pipe

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by awestonvp View Post
                        So, first I got the before dyno. Ambient temp both days was 17c.
                        I did 3 runs, first peaked at 113, but the ecu was still sorting itself out.
                        2nd run was 114
                        3rd run was 115 but fell off after about 6000rpm due to heat soak.
                        So on the chart (previous post) I used the 2nd run for comparison.

                        I then fitted the SEAT intake, and after stitches and a blood transfusion, began to test.

                        You may recall from the first exciting episode, that I had a connection for the vac gauge at the rear of the intake tube, just before the airbox. This is where I connected it for the next set of tests.

                        With the standard intake I'd had a reading of 28.5.

                        With the new intake I got 11.2 - pretty pleased!

                        I then cut away the deflection flap in the intake just behind the grill (see Shanes pics in anther thread).

                        With this done I got 5.2 !!!! (You were right Shane!)
                        This was a huge improvement from 28.5

                        I then measured from the top of the airbox (to get a reading across the filter) and got 7.2 This is pretty damn good for any filter, let alone a stock one. So I dont think there'd be any improvement with an aftermarket filter.

                        Next was the turbo side of the MAF where I got 23.9
                        Big frustration, really poorly designed grills in the MAF, but still a hell of a lot better than the 44.7 with the standard inlet.

                        So, seeing as 44.7 equals about 1.6 psi, with the original intake I was feeding the turbo with air at 13.1psi. With the new inlet, its about 13.9 psi.
                        And I figure if you're feeding the turbo denser air, its going to do a bit more, despite any limitations of its performance envelope, and this was born out by the dyno results and the Butt-o-meter.

                        In the future? Well, the MAF grill from a VL Commodore is a much better design and a larger diameter. The grill is called a Flow Straightener, but as far as I know, it's actually a flow enturbulator, that is it creates an even enturbulation of the airflow thru the MAF to even out any disruptions in the flow so that the MAF gets a representative sample of the airflow. And so of course its very restrictive, hence the test figures.

                        Anyone want to try it...?
                        bumping up an old thread - but a very good one.

                        Did any one found a solution for the restriction in the MAF?
                        Removing those grilles awestonvp was talking about? or changing the maf housing?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          im guessing the maf housing from the mark 1 tt 225 or the s3 3 inch housing should solve the trick. a bonus is when you upgrade to the k04 you already have one of the useful componants of the transistion.
                          " I wait I resolution derive pleasure this " latest spammer post

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            There's a glass half full comment Mike, something you want to tell us

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by mikepologti View Post
                              im guessing the maf housing from the mark 1 tt 225 or the s3 3 inch housing should solve the trick. a bonus is when you upgrade to the k04 you already have one of the useful componants of the transistion.

                              If you make that change, you'll need software as the scaling for the airflow will be wrong. The ECU would see a drop in airflow and reduce fuelling accordingly, which wouldn't be good.

                              You can only fit the larger MAF as part of a complete package.

                              Gavin
                              optimumcode@gmail.com | https://www.vwwatercooled.com.au/for...i-;-79012.html | https://www.facebook.com/TTY-Euro-107982291992533

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                But if the MAF sensor itself is changed with the uprated one (not only the housing) there will still be problems with ecu readings ?

                                And one more question, what other changes are needed to install the 3'' maf when everything else around it is stock?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X