Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whats quicker? APR Polo Gti or AFM SS VE?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Take them to the track...

    NATSOFT Race Result

    Note that the F360 that's listed just above the Polo on that page is actually a Walkinshaw W427 as the guy's 360 broke down on the way to the track. If that's all they can get out of that beast than the Polo should have no problem against an SS...

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by insanekiwi View Post
      <snip>
      LOL!

      I'll have whatever your smoking... because your post is a pile of dreamt up nonsense. 145kw with stage 2.... umm... riiiiiight.

      Let alone getting close to a VE SS time in that.
      Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
      Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

      Comment


      • #18
        Just for fun - Simple power to weight:

        Boggo VE-SS: 1790 kg, 270 kw - 6.6 kg/kw

        Stock polo: 1190 kg, 110 kw - 10.8 kg/kw
        Chipped polo: 1190 kg, 150 kw - 7.9 kg/kw
        Chip, zorst, FMIC polo: 1190 kg, 170 kw - 7.0 kg/kw

        SS wins.

        Comment


        • #19
          Honestly, who the **** cares?? I have a Polo just because I like it, and it is a fun car to drive. It suits what I want in a car, and for what I want to do. I don't have a family to ship around in it, and if I need the space to put something big in the car, I just drop the seats. I have humbled many a Commodore or falcon in the windy stuff, and for me that matters.
          Drive the car you want, don't have a car, bag it out on a forum, sell it with its dodgy mods (cut springs, Bunnings water tap, etc), buy another, then another, all the time coming back to the same forum and regretting the car you bagged out in the first place.

          Fcuk off Petrina, and go troll somewhere else, we don't want you here. If Boost doesn't want you, you have no hope!!
          "If can't get behind your troops, feel free to stand in front of them..."

          Comment


          • #20
            Dare I ask, what this water tap "mod" was all about? LOL
            BLACK 2.0 FSI Jetta -
            Transforms - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgjFFxjkZlQ

            Comment


            • #21
              Just be nice guys!
              Performance Tunes from $850
              Wrecking RS OCTAVIA 2 Link

              Comment


              • #22
                You can laugh all you want. I had 136kw at wheels on my slightly heat soaked GTI in summer with Stage 1. The Stage 2 REVO is different from typical APR / GIAC. I don't see why adding more fuel and advancing the timing with higher fuel pressure regulator in winter (much cooler now) cannot get close to 145kw at wheels. 136kw at wheels was Stage 1 REVO, down pipe, Seat intake, K&N in terms of power. Now added 4 bar pressure fuel regulator, turbo TIP, Forge DV with stronger springs, Stage 2, rolling dyno with VAGCOM + cooler weather - I don't see 145kw as impossible.

                You don't have to act like a **** to win a prize dude.


                Originally posted by break View Post
                LOL!

                I'll have whatever your smoking... because your post is a pile of dreamt up nonsense. 145kw with stage 2.... umm... riiiiiight.

                Let alone getting close to a VE SS time in that.
                06 Polo GTI - REVO Stage 2 = 140kw @ wheels.
                06 Golf GTI - Bluefin Stage 1 blacked out with ED30 theme, leather, xenon, etc.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by philthy View Post
                  Just for fun - Simple power to weight:

                  Boggo VE-SS: 1790 kg, 270 kw - 6.6 kg/kw

                  Stock polo: 1190 kg, 110 kw - 10.8 kg/kw
                  Chipped polo: 1190 kg, 150 kw - 7.9 kg/kw
                  Chip, zorst, FMIC polo: 1190 kg, 170 kw - 7.0 kg/kw

                  SS wins.
                  i don't think you thought this true...
                  you also have the gearing, the way it puts his power down, amount of grip...etc
                  does the SS have to power they quoted from factory? more/less?
                  and last but not least, drivers make the difference.
                  its not allways just power to weight ratio's irl

                  i proved this alot of times against cars that could be faster "on paper" :-p

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by insanekiwi View Post
                    <snip>
                    I'm sure any chipped Polo could do 136kw @ wheels on a dyno in shootout mode running in 3rd gear... but hey... what do I know

                    The topic is would a chipped Polo be quicker than a VE SS, and the answer is a definite no. Not even with as many auxillary mods as you want, the little K03s can't push out enough HP to make the Polo a contender.
                    Previous Rides: Polo GTI, Mx5 10AE, MY05 WRX WRP10, Renault Sport Clio 172
                    Current Ride: Evo 8 MR, Fabia MK3

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by instigator View Post
                      i don't think you thought this true...
                      you also have the gearing, the way it puts his power down, amount of grip...etc
                      does the SS have to power they quoted from factory? more/less?
                      and last but not least, drivers make the difference.
                      its not allways just power to weight ratio's irl

                      i proved this alot of times against cars that could be faster "on paper" :-p
                      That's why I put in my disclaimer on the first line

                      Having said that, my friends mildly tuned VZ SS with an LS1 (with intake, exhaust & tune) felt a lot quicker to drive than my chipped polo. In terms of grip, I would think the RWD commodore with it's wider tyres would be better off.

                      Not bagging the polo. I love driving mine. It's just not going to keep up with a modern 6.0 litre V8.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Guys, why do we bother. Just enjoy your car.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by pog View Post
                          Guys, why do we bother. Just enjoy your car.
                          I find it an interesting topic.

                          I don't see why discussing the performance of a car is taboo. If you're not interested tune out.

                          Also as indicated by some of the responses above, some people have a personal grudge against Petrina due to his participation on a number of forums other than VWW.

                          My advice: don't take the internet too seriously.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by philthy View Post
                            I find it an interesting topic.

                            I don't see why discussing the performance of a car is taboo. If you're not interested tune out.

                            Also as indicated by some of the responses above, some people have a personal grudge against Petrina due to his participation on a number of forums other than VWW.

                            My advice: don't take the internet too seriously.
                            we dont have a grudge with petrina for going on other forums the issue is he is a troll
                            Originally posted by seangti
                            The price of the car rarely indicates driver ability/lap time.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by jasn78 View Post
                              the issue is he is a troll
                              Well I can't argue with that.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Thread closed! Sorry guys I don't see anything good in it.
                                Performance Tunes from $850
                                Wrecking RS OCTAVIA 2 Link

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X