APR ECU Version 2.0 loaded...!

[Quest]

laisser les filles seules, vous êtes un vilain garçon

Elles me courent après je n'y peut rien...

So, let's go back to the topic and respectively to the other members in english please !

I really think the V2 is good for me in New Caledonia coz we haven't yet any track road...

[Flaps]

Flaps - Bug Racer - still waiting to hear from you both

As you can see my reply post was deleted. You're a little late on the help since I sold the car a year ago. 4 months went by with no fix from APR so I sold it.

[Guy_H]

As you can see my reply post was deleted. You're a little late on the help since I sold the car a year ago. 4 months went by with no fix from APR so I sold it.

Flaps - I didn't see your reply - thats why I asked you for a PM or an email please - so send it to me & I'll look into it. - This thread is about V 2.0

[GT3]

Actually got .2kw more peak power with V2

[VW GTI]

My dyno runs for V1 and V2 below. Actually got .2kw more peak power with V2, and it held peak well compared to V1. But that's irrelevant - from as low 2500rpm V2 surges with power and hits (wait for it) just over 360nm of torque and sustains it !!! There's a 42nm gain with V2. With a FMIC, the high-end power issues with V2 would be sorted. IMO, APR HQ should highlight V1 on their servers and simply hit the 'delete' button

I'm worried about your maths... 360-328 = 32.

But regardless of your grade 4 results (), you got a dyno sheet of the torque?

[Flaps]

you got a dyno sheet of the torque?

it's there

[RhysQ]

looks good Neil. its good to get a dyno print out of the V1 and V2 on an otherwise stock car.

Timbo, Flaps and Grant were saying that this seems similar to what the GIAC and REVO tunes were doing. anyone got any dyno sheets with the GIAC and/or REVO tunes on an otherwise stock car??

it would be good to compare torque curves...but i am only asking for this if it will not start a war, so please co-operate people! just post up the graphs and we'll discuss the curve differences.

[VW GTI]

it's there

Ahh, didn't think about it not being in Nms. The torque curve does look a lot better.

Rhys, get the one of the REVO/GIAC sites if you want that.

[RhysQ]

Ahh, didn't think about it not being in Nms. The torque curve does look a lot better.

Rhys, get the one of the REVO/GIAC sites if you want that.

aahh good idea. might have a looksee there!

Sam?? no more tosspot?

[VW GTI]

Sam?? no more tosspot?

Long story, but yes.

[Timbo]

Here's my original REVO dyno chart, FWIW

[RhysQ]

here they are side by side. it is probably not the best comparison as the APR V2 test is done in 4th gear and the REVO done in 3rd. meh, it was worth a try.

good to see that both max powers are very much the same. i got a 123.8kW on V1 as well so power wise i say they are pretty even.

EDIT: how is Timbo's max torque 598.5Nm?..... thats nuts

[VW GTI]

here they are side by side. it is probably not the best comparison as the APR V2 test is done in 4th gear and the REVO done in 3rd. meh, it was worth a try.

good to see that both max powers are very much the same. i got a 123.8kW on V1 as well so power wise i say they are pretty even.

The speeds are all wrong for the gears listed anyway

The car does 160 in 3rd and fast than that in 4th. How come the 3rd run goes to 120 and the 4th run goes to 160?

Also... Timbo's is using a 100tune with 100 fuel (not sold in Aus anymore). Neil's I assume is a 98 tune with 98.

[Timbo]

Timbo's is using a 100tune with 100 fuel (not sold in Aus anymore)

There was bugger all in that Shell V-Power Racing, anyway. It was just a 98 + ethanol blend, not a real 100 or 104 racing fuel, yet Shell gouged another 10-12 cpl for it I think I posted a dyno with the 98 tune, using that fuel, and it was pretty much the same.

[stir] Anyway, it's good to see the APR tune has finally caught up with REVO an GIAC [/stir]

[DubSteve]

[stir] Anyway, it's good to see the APR tune has finally caught up with REVO an GIAC [/stir]

Haha Tims stiring it up good