Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tiguan R Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by hamisticle View Post
    Does anyone know what the factory privacy glass tint percentages are for Tiguan 162TSI? Someone posted the specs from VWA bit I can't find it!
    Hi Hami, here is the link I posted some time back #2596

    Comment


    • #32
      Thanks Mikey, that's what I was trying to find! Cheers


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      MY18 162 TSI + R-Line + DAP +Pure white

      Comment


      • #33
        Well SEAT beat them to the R punch - 221kw Cupra version of the Ateca

        Cupra: Seat sub-brand launches hot Ateca, Leon TCR
        Indium Grey Golf 7.5 Alltrack 135tdi Premium - all options

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Rooboy View Post
          Well SEAT beat them to the R punch - 221kw Cupra version of the Ateca

          Cupra: Seat sub-brand launches hot Ateca, Leon TCR
          ..and substantially better looking to boot - particularly the execution of the rear, pun not really intended.

          --- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm -------------------------------------------------------------------
          2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
          2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
          2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs

          Comment


          • #35
            But they need to do the LWB version too. The Tiguan is useless to anyone who carries more than a pair of shoes in the boot unless it's in LWB form. There's just not enough room in the standard one. Yes I'm exaggerating a bit, but still, we'd have a Tiguan instead of a Passat if the Tiguan had more space.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Rocket36 View Post
              But they need to do the LWB version too. The Tiguan is useless to anyone who carries more than a pair of shoes in the boot unless it's in LWB form. There's just not enough room in the standard one. Yes I'm exaggerating a bit, but still, we'd have a Tiguan instead of a Passat if the Tiguan had more space.
              Are you talking about gen 1 or gen 2 as the boot space seems pretty big to me in the gen 2

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Grugly View Post
                Are you talking about gen 1 or gen 2 as the boot space seems pretty big to me in the gen 2
                Even compared to Gen 2 the Passat is quite a bit larger. The kicker for me is the length. The Passat is around 190cm from the rear of the boot to the back of the front seat. Tiguan is 160-something. This means I can load skis or a surfboard (usually around 180cm) in a Passat down the centre of the 40:20:40 split rear seats, have two rear passengers and a comfortable driving position. I can then lock the gear securely in the car. This isn’t possible in the Tiguan (requires a diagonal loading or roof racks etc). Even the current Touareg has a shorter load area than the Passat. The Tiguan also has that annoying hard load cover like my golf. The Passat however lacks the 7sp wet DSG and a few other things I’d like to see. Each to their own. I’m going to wait and see if I can afford the new Touareg which may solve for everything.
                MY14 MK VII GTI | Pure White | Manual | Bi-Xenons (his)
                MY19 B8 Passat 206TSI wagon | Manganese Grey (hers)

                Comment


                • #38
                  I looked at the MY18 Tiguan. There's not enough room for just our great dane in the back! In the Passat, I can put the great dane and our pram in the boot. This means we have the baby seat, enough room for another adult and space between them on the middle seat, or just a clear back seat other than the baby seat.

                  Another thing when you've got length - leg room! I'm 6'2" and didn't want to be stuck with another Commodore wagon just because it's one of the few cars with enough leg room. Adjusting the seat for me driving is my test. I then get in the back seat behind the driver. Not a chance in the Tiguan. Fine in the Passat wagon.

                  I also personally find the seating position in a car driver's seat, rather than an SUV or 4WD driver's seat far more comfortable. Especially on the long drives.

                  Originally posted by Jimi View Post
                  I’m going to wait and see if I can afford the new Touareg which may solve for everything.
                  It will be our 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee replacement. If it's as good as or better than the Volvo XC90 that is.
                  Last edited by Rocket36; 28-02-2018, 07:20 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    how did a Tiguan R discussion go so far off topic...
                    Indium Grey Golf 7.5 Alltrack 135tdi Premium - all options

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      This is discussion about how if there is a Tiguan R, it better be on the LWB platform so it's actually a properly usable SUV in terms of cargo space.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        if you had have said "better on a long wheelbase to aid handling" I might have believed you...but cargo space is irrelevant for an R performance variant.
                        Indium Grey Golf 7.5 Alltrack 135tdi Premium - all options

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Rooboy View Post
                          if you had have said "better on a long wheelbase to aid handling" I might have believed you...but cargo space is irrelevant for an R performance variant.
                          In your opinion. Not to me. It's exceptionally relevant to ANY vehicle I buy, so if that happens to be a R-Line Tiguan, then it needs more cargo space than a standard Tiguan!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Rocket36 View Post
                            In your opinion. Not to me. It's exceptionally relevant to ANY vehicle I buy, so if that happens to be a R-Line Tiguan, then it needs more cargo space than a standard Tiguan!
                            Don’t forget to strap the Great Dane down before you take off in the LWB R
                            Tiguan Highline 162TSI | Indium Grey | DAP | MY18

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              lol! Compared with the TD V6 in the Jeep, there won't be a problem with ANY VW SUV. Well at least until we replace the Jeep with the new Toureg.
                              Last edited by Rocket36; 28-02-2018, 02:03 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by tigger73 View Post
                                Pretty sure the exhaust on the 162 R-line is exactly same as Highline (no spec changes) and will be pretty quiet - no DSG pops. You'll have to get an aftermarket/custom cat-back exhaust to get any noise.
                                Yup - ours is disappointingly subtle!
                                Last edited by tigger73; 28-02-2018, 09:00 PM.
                                TroyBoy71
                                2017 Tiguan 162TSI Highline, Indium Grey with R-Line Pack

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X