Just filled up. 6.1 l/100km, at 5000 km, urban driving mostly peak hour freeway, diesel wagon. Can't complain.
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fuel Consumption - How's THAT going ?
Collapse
X
-
Turbo v non-turbo fuel economy
I realise people don't buy GTI's for fuel economy but .......
I'm going from a Mk5 Comfortline (petrol 2.0L) to a Mk7 GTI (turbo petrol 2.0L).
Now we know the attractions of turbos is more power, more fuel economy ... but of course not at the same time
So my question is ..... if I drive my new GTI like an old fart (which I am
) could I approach or even better the fuel economy of my old car?
Comment
-
I used to have a 2.0T Quattro A3 and I averaged about 8L/100 mainly Sydney peak hour driving, with a stage 1 ecu upgrade. My wife's 2.0 FSI tiptronic mkv Golf Comfortline struggles to get under double figures...
So moral of the story is throttle control had a huge impact on consumption figures2011 Skoda Octavia vRS TDI DSG wagon|Revo Stage 1|Race Blue|Leather|Dynamic Xenons w 6000K|9w7 BT|THA475 Amp+active sub|Whiteline ALK|RVC|
2009 R36 wagon|Biscay Blue|RVC|Tailgate|ECU and DSG tune|LED DRL/Indicators|3D colour cluster|Quad LED tail rings|Climatronics upgrade|Dynaudio retrofit|B7 RLine Flat Steering Wheel|3AA CCM|TPMS Direct|B7 Adaptive Cruise with Front Assist|Discover Media retrofit|PLA 2.0|Lane Assist|BCM retrofit|High Beam Assist|DQ500
Comment
-
I manage a displayed 9.5L/100km around town through Adelaide's rather subdued peak hour.
Drops into the low 8s when cruising more freely.
Hoping a tune up can make those numbers better (unless I hoof it!!)Current - 2007 Golf GTI, DSG, RCD510, K&N Panel Filter, BSH PCV revamp, Bluefin Stage 1 tune, 18" Omanyt's with RE003s.
Previous - 2003 Renault Clio Sport 172 - Flame Red. -Gone-
Comment
-
I am sure you can. It is there in manufacture data too,Originally posted by Moonee View PostI realise people don't buy GTI's for fuel economy but .......
I'm going from a Mk5 Comfortline (petrol 2.0L) to a Mk7 GTI (turbo petrol 2.0L).
Now we know the attractions of turbos is more power, more fuel economy ... but of course not at the same time
So my question is ..... if I drive my new GTI like an old fart (which I am
) could I approach or even better the fuel economy of my old car?
for Mk5 Comfortline Triptronic - combined fuel economy 8.5L/100km (132
for MK7 DSG GTI - combined fuel economy 6.6L/100km
New engines are more efficient, less friction in moving parts and they run somewhat lean on freeway cruising situations (these turbo engines are build rugged). Also New GTI is lighter and more aerodynamically efficient and handles much better (so you don't have to brake each and every bend/corner you find on the road). Also DSG gearbox is more efficient than old triptronic system too.
2013 Tiguan 155kW DSG | Leather | Bi Xenon's | Park Assist 2.0 | Panoramic Sunroof | RCD 510 | RVC | MDI
Mods: APR K04 v3.1 | HPA Haldex | S3 Intercooler | Custom 3" Quad Tip Exhaust | Carbonio Intake | WL HD RSB | GFB DV+ | Koni Yellow Sport Struts & Eibach Springs | HP LCAs | Custom Audio ( Alpine MRX V70 , Audison Bit Ten , Dynamat , Stealth Sub ) | Car Tablet | CB Radio | Sports Pedals | RLine Door Sills | Wheel Arch Extensions | 3 Bar MAP & BKR8EIX | RT VCDS .... Performance: 0 - 100 km/h, 5.0 seconds ( Racelogic PBox tested ) Tiguan Build Thread
Comment
-
you'll get better economy - esp if you use 98ron.Originally posted by Moonee View PostSo my question is ..... if I drive my new GTI like an old fart (which I am
) could I approach or even better the fuel economy of my old car?
My old Mk3.5 Cabrio 2.0 5 speed used to average 8.5L/100km.
I have a 1.8tsi 6 speed 1st gen EA888 with a few mods & a tune and I average 6.6L/100km. VW Turbos are the best of both worlds.carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums
Comment
-
You don't always find that what the manufacturer claims is the result you get in the real world too. My brother runs a 2003 Forester manual 2.5 that Subaru claimed about 9.5L/100km combined and my other car is a turbo Forester XT manual that Subaru claimed 11.4l/100km. That's a big difference yet we get almost identical consumption figures on the road, even when driving in convoy and swapping cars. And overall we both average around 9.3L/100km.Nov '15 Polo 81TSI manual white
Comment
-
Agree with what others have said, sure the usage will spike if you're going hard at it on the twisties, but in general cruising it's a pretty economical beast.
Since my commute changed to a 20km run one way, I'm getting around 6.9-7.3l/100km in the mornings (emptier roads, overall downhill run) and around 7.8-8.8l/100km in the evenings (more stop-start traffic).
I happened to click over to my all time average over 4,500km which is sitting on 8.7l/100km, but that was skewed by my Adelaide travels - I now expect it to settle into the lower 8s.
My Mk6 probably used a little more but not surprisingly was fairly comparable. I remember I used to do an 'economy' run from my folks place at night over 6-7km and try to get to the mid 5s - needed some friendly light changes for that.
--- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm -------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs
Comment
-
Having gotten about 3/4 of the way through my first tank of 98 RON, I'm averaging 7.8lit/100k. Based on this I should be getting around 700k's per tank. Only been city driving so far with one trip out to Mt Samson and back.2015 Mk 7 DSG 90TSI - Pacific Blue w/ Aspen alloys
Comment
-
I live 10km from work but have about 16 sets of traffic lights on the way >.< . My 90tsi gets about 6.3 on an average run, 7.5 on a bad run, and as low as 4.9 on an awesome run, which means stopping at 5 sets of lights or less! Weekend driving sees me average 5.3-5.6, so all in all, very happy with my car
I'm getting about 850km per tank, which is great for me, though a couple trips to the airport saw my range jump up to the high 900s. It's amazing to think what the car could be capable of if I had a longer drive to work!
Comment
-
I've now have passed 56,000km in less than 17 months in my 90 TSI and I seem to be getting 5.3L/100km long term average almost every time. When I calculate it though that ends up being a real 5.5L/100km - so much for accurate gauges. I do a lot of highway km's where the indicated average is nearly always in the mid to high 4's. It's the low 7's I get around the city that bring the long term average up.
The same driving in our Forester XT gives a real long term average of 9.3L/100km so, along with all the other positives of the Golf, you can easily guess which car gets the most use.Nov '15 Polo 81TSI manual white
Comment
-
Tweak it so it's accurate! Worked for me.Originally posted by Mountainman View PostI seem to be getting 5.3L/100km long term average almost every time. When I calculate it though that ends up being a real 5.5L/100km - so much for accurate gauges. I do a lot of highway km's where the indicated average is nearly always in the mid to high 4's. .
Mpg gauge correction and adjustment - mk5, mk6 VW | VW TDI forum, Audi, Porsche, and Chevy Cruze diesel forumcarandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums
Comment
2025 - Below Forum
Collapse

Comment