Originally posted by Guy_H
View Post
Originally posted by Guy_H
View Post
It also wouldn't be fair to impose more frequent services than is necessary for drivers whose oil can last 15k (or whatever) between changes.
In terms of wear, UOAs are more useful for determining wear rates rather than a snapshot of what the actual wear numbers are. And in order to establish the rate of wear, one must take frequent samples at regular intervals (which is what I think Transporter is alluding to).
And just to stay on topic, here's a thought - perhaps the reason why the 1000 km service (or equivalent) is no longer done is because most engines these days now take longer to break-in due to synthetic oil being used as first-fill, as well as (but not exclusively) for cost reasons - what's the point, you're just delaying break-in by changing it out early... and the problem with using mineral oil in any advanced engine is that they'll fail to protect the engine sufficiently, even in that short period of time... opinions?
Comment