Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)

Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
2 of 2 < >

Welcome to the new look VWWatercooled

After much work and little sleep there is a new version of the forums running on more powerful and recent hardware as well as an upgraded software platform.

Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.

The new forum software is an upgraded version of what came before, it's mostly the same but also a little different. Hopefully easier to use and more stable than before. We are learning together here, so please be patient. If you have questions, please post them here. If you have worked something out and can provide an answer,
See more
See less

GTI vs R32

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GTI vs R32

    Hi Guys,

    How does a stock Mark V GTI stack up against an stockR32, and secondly how would a stage 1 (flashed ECU) Mark V GTI go against a stock R32?
    2007 Golf GTI
    .. (Arsenal) ..

  • #2
    I think stock R32 is quicker, but Stage I GTI will be quicker than R32 stock.
    Genuine VW Parts Importer | Navigation | Bluetooth |
    sigpic
    Repairs | Lighting | Coding | Programming |Cameras

    Comment


    • #3
      R32 is faster stock for stock.. which would explain the $20,000 price difference

      Comment


      • #4
        Go the GTI if you want tuning potential. If you want a horn exhaust note and AWD get the R32
        VW: it aint just a car, its a way of life
        There are few things more satisfying in life than finding a solution to a problem and implementing it
        My Blog: tinkererstales.blogspot.com.au

        Comment


        • #5
          There is absolutely no room for Arsenal supporters on this forum !!

          I'm with Golfman on this one and he is spot on ! Personally im not a fan of the Mk5 R32 and i feel that the MK5 gti front end has a much more aggressive stance!

          But it all comes down to what you are expecting and wanting in a car...

          Stock for stock yes the 32 would be quicker.. but who drives stock cars these days

          Comment


          • #6
            32 will get you off the line and you prob wont make it back until top of 2nd and then pull away in 3rd.. In a manual GTI (stage 1) anyway..

            Rolling start 60k 2nd gear not much in it all stock for stock..

            Stage 2 GTI hands out an ass woopin to any 32 short of having internals or FI.. Long as you're getting traction..

            Comment


            • #7
              Doesnt the saying go there is no replacement for displacement.

              The AWD would pwnt all over the FWD aswell and dont even get started on that exhaust note. Not to mention the balla factor for being able to afford the 20k extra. The premo recaro seats etc etc. Some times it isnt just about speed coz itll get smoked by any commonwhore with a 6L.
              Last edited by Spyda; 11-11-2009, 06:21 PM.
              MK1 GLS 3door
              A4 B7 2.0T

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by NJAY87 View Post

                Stock for stock yes the 32 would be quicker.. but who drives stock cars these days
                A hell of a lot more than modify them.

                I did my share of modding in the past, but prefer now to just buy the car that fits my needs and if i want to go fast i have a bike in the garage for that.

                Save the $$ for the next car (or bike) upgrade.
                currrently... MY10 GTI | DSG | Candy White | Sunroof | 18's | BT | MDI
                previously... MY08 GT TDI | DSG | Reflex Silver | Sunroof

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by GoLfMan View Post
                  Go the GTI if you want tuning potential. If you want a horn exhaust note and AWD and heaps of chicks and life to be grand get the R32
                  Fixed it for you

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Spyda View Post
                    Doesnt the saying go there is no replacement for displacement.
                    Its called a turbo. And ppl should give the GTI more credit for its exhaust note very clean for a 4 cylinder, 32's can sound a bit farty sometimes..
                    Last edited by chrisgti; 11-11-2009, 07:16 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by chrisgti View Post
                      Its called a turbo. And ppl should give the GTI more credit for its exhaust note very clean for a 4 cylinder, 32's can sound a bit farty sometimes..
                      Both of ours with Milltek were glorious, I agree.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by G-rig View Post
                        Both of ours with Milltek were glorious, I agree.
                        yeah boys in blue didnt agree tho me thinks.. I laughed when I saw you bragging about beating me tho Greg.. I think you had jtw's hopes up he could keep up with gti's before he got the 32 and then he got it only to get wooped by shinys giac'd gti..

                        Something surprising I found out tho.. Shiny's exhaust custom 3 " DP to stock cat back is louder than my resonated turbo back Milltek

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well it seemed pretty Even-Stephen to me at the time. Thought you would like that .
                          14.0 is ok but for your mods was expecting a bit more, that MPS was fast in the video.

                          Stock for stock an R32 is faster, and more cool in general .
                          Last edited by G-rig; 11-11-2009, 08:07 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by G-rig View Post
                            Well it seemed pretty Even-Stephen to me at the time. Thought you would like that
                            yeah I guess, if you call 40 to 80 a race.. more than happy to go for a proper run and put you in your place

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by chrisgti View Post
                              yeah I guess, if you call 40 to 80 a race.. more than happy to go for a proper run and put you in your place
                              Well mine would be quicker off the mark as well if that's your thing. You may win the 100-140 or something on the freeway but that's kewel .

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X