G-8VXWWTRHPN Incorrect Fuel Reading/Idle Consumption High - VWWatercooled Australia

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)

Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
2 of 2 < >

Welcome to the new look VWWatercooled

After much work and little sleep there is a new version of the forums running on more powerful and recent hardware as well as an upgraded software platform.

Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.

The new forum software is an upgraded version of what came before, it's mostly the same but also a little different. Hopefully easier to use and more stable than before. We are learning together here, so please be patient. If you have questions, please post them here. If you have worked something out and can provide an answer,
See more
See less

Incorrect Fuel Reading/Idle Consumption High

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Incorrect Fuel Reading/Idle Consumption High

    Hey all,

    I recently serviced the following on my Diesel engine and concerned about the latter: MAF sensor clean with Liqui Moly MAF sensor cleaner, air filter change, fuel filter change, and Liqui Moly 500mL fuel system purge via fuel lines.
    All of these were done successfully with no problems encountered. I kept the fuel line in the mason jar when purging the system without sucking in air at all. No leaks coming from fuel lines either when engine is running.

    Results:
    - My idling was at 0.6l/h and is now 0.8-1.0/h… does not change.
    - Average fuel consumption was 5.9l/km and is now 7.2-8l/km with 50-60km/hr speeds.
    - When idling, the 0.0l/km reading increases every 10 seconds, doesn’t stop and can keep going until it maxes out. I recall is wouldn’t change values until I acc understand this is not a reliable source of readings, but a change has developed since the recent service that I have performed so I’ve done something wrong here.
    I’ve disconnected the battery to reset the ECU but hasn’t helped.

    Is the MAF sensor faulty? Does this go away when the liqui moly is depleted from the system? I sprayed the MAF sensor without contact and allowed it to dry.

    Appreciate the upcoming feedback.

  • #2
    Plugged in the VCDS and was presented with the following:

    Address 01: Engine Labels: 03G-906-016-BKD.clb
    Control Module Part Number: 03G 906 021 KK HW: 03G 906 021 KK
    Component and/or Version: R4 2,0L EDC G000AG 9970
    Software Coding: 0000078
    Work Shop Code: WSC 20117 959 97404
    VCID: 72B6B0B228A39D6B897-8026
    1 Fault Found:

    000258 – Mass Air Flow Sensor (G70)
    P0102 – 000 – Signal too Low – Intermittent
    Freeze Frame:
    Fault Status: 00110000
    Fault Priority: 2
    Fault Frequency: 1
    Reset counter: 255
    Mileage: 119589 km
    Time Indication: 0
    Date: 2000.00.00
    Time: 14:03:14

    Freeze Frame:
    RPM: 1218 /min
    Speed: 0.0 km/h
    Load: 0.0 %
    Duty Cycle: 79.7 %
    Bin. Bits: 00101000
    Mass Air / Rev.: 615.0 mg/str
    Mass Air / Rev.: 0.0 mg/str

    Readiness: 0 0 0 0 0

    Comment


    • #3
      Its possible that the MAF sensor has died and may need replacement. Otherwise, check that you have it installed facing the right way and the plug is plugged in properly.

      If the engine does not know how much air is being sucked in, then it wont know how much diesel it needs to achieve its desired air:fuel ratios, so it will default to a safe air:fuel combination which is always rich to be safe. Rich = using more fuel than usual/necessary.

      Cleaning the MAF is safe and you have used a correct MAF cleaning product. The product evaporates very quickly so the product dries within 10-15 seconds of spraying on the MAF.

      Try unplugging the MAF and see if the car behaves any differently. If not, then the MAF needs replacing. (assuming its not incorrectly installed)
      2017 Ford Fiesta ST the go kart

      2015 Audi SQ5 bi-turbo V6 TDI family hauler

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Lucas_R View Post
        Its possible that the MAF sensor has died and may need replacement. Otherwise, check that you have it installed facing the right way and the plug is plugged in properly.

        If the engine does not know how much air is being sucked in, then it wont know how much diesel it needs to achieve its desired air:fuel ratios, so it will default to a safe air:fuel combination which is always rich to be safe. Rich = using more fuel than usual/necessary.

        Cleaning the MAF is safe and you have used a correct MAF cleaning product. The product evaporates very quickly so the product dries within 10-15 seconds of spraying on the MAF.

        Try unplugging the MAF and see if the car behaves any differently. If not, then the MAF needs replacing. (assuming its not incorrectly installed)
        I have done as you suggested with unplugging the MAF sensor and no difference was noted. Idling was at 0.8l/km still. I will use another MAF sensor on this car to see if it resolves it but how in the world would cleaning the MAF sensor cause a fault?! I left it out to dry for 30 minutes and plugged it back in.
        Last edited by Righteousness; 25-05-2021, 02:20 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Righteousness View Post
          How in the world would the MAF sensor from me cleaning it?!
          Could just be coincidence. They do tend to have a lifespan though.

          A few weeks ago I helped my neighbour to troubleshoot an issue with his Mercedes van - turns out it was a dodgy MAF. That was a 2013 model Sprinter van (ex Ambulance and has done 340,000kms). The van had heavily reduced power and error codes for a bad MAF. New MAF sourced from overseas (for about 1/3 of the price of getting it locally) installed and the van is running like new again. I tried cleaning it before buying a new MAF but it didnt do anything.
          2017 Ford Fiesta ST the go kart

          2015 Audi SQ5 bi-turbo V6 TDI family hauler

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Lucas_R View Post
            Could just be coincidence. They do tend to have a lifespan though.

            A few weeks ago I helped my neighbour to troubleshoot an issue with his Mercedes van - turns out it was a dodgy MAF. That was a 2013 model Sprinter van (ex Ambulance and has done 340,000kms). The van had heavily reduced power and error codes for a bad MAF. New MAF sourced from overseas (for about 1/3 of the price of getting it locally) installed and the van is running like new again. I tried cleaning it before buying a new MAF but it didnt do anything.
            $3-400 for a new BOSCH MAF sensor.. the car has only done 120,000kms at the moment.

            Comment


            • #7
              Air Mass Sensor MAF 8ET 009 142-571 Hella for VW Skoda Audi | Run Auto Parts

              Air Mass Sensor MAF 0 281 002 461 Bosch for Skoda VW Audi | Run Auto Parts

              or... Darkside Developments - NEW Bosch MAF Sensor for VW 1.9 & 2.0 8v TDI PD Engines choose the DHL shipping and it will be here within 5 business days (I ordered something from them about a month ago).
              2017 Ford Fiesta ST the go kart

              2015 Audi SQ5 bi-turbo V6 TDI family hauler

              Comment


              • #8
                In my reading, chip based MAF sensors are very reliable.

                Most likely cause seems to be failing lambda sensor.

                Apparently there are some measurements in measuring block 30 via VCDS that may indicate this, but i haven’t found a good diagnostic guide.
                Bosch suggests lambda sensors could be good for 160,000 km.

                Old Bosch Australia oxygen sensor catalog 2013-4 has the most useful diagnostic and technical info i have found. Failing sensor reports oxygen closer to atmospheric causing computer to compensate with richer mixture. Tailpipe smell test indicated rich. That has corrected with new sensor.

                Got a new Bosch lambda sensor and reported fuel consumption has dropped to lowest ever for daily drive. Only done half a tank.
                2015 Polo Comfortline 6M + Driving Comfort Package
                2011/11 Yeti 103 TDI 6M + Columbus media centre/satnav
                (2008 MY09 Polo 9N3 TDI retired hurt hail damage)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bluey View Post
                  In my reading, chip based MAF sensors are very reliable.
                  Except maybe they are not. There are traces of oily residue in the intake ducting from some hose upstream. Maybe that has contaminated the sensor. MAF sensor cost about $135 and swapping is a 5-10 min job. Would swap out MAF sensor before oxygen sensor knowing whst i do now.

                  Have disassembled the old MAF sensor and can’t see any visible evidence why it is misbehaving.

                  My brother had dealer swap lambda sensor in UP for $800!
                  2015 Polo Comfortline 6M + Driving Comfort Package
                  2011/11 Yeti 103 TDI 6M + Columbus media centre/satnav
                  (2008 MY09 Polo 9N3 TDI retired hurt hail damage)

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X