If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed, registering will remove the in post advertisements. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This means you should apply for your renewal now to avoid any disruptions to your membership whilst the renewal process is taking place! NOTE: If you have an auto renewing subscription this will happen automatically.
Yet again, Dave's right. i think that there is some (possibly future) penalty in Europe for cars over a certain capacity, hence the need for smaller engines with TSI. Having said that, it would be interesting to see how the 2.0L fares with TSI, and how it compares, stats wise and driving wise, with the present car. Will it be smoother? Will it have as linear a torque curve? VW got it just right with the MarkV, so what have they found that needs improving, and how will they go about it, rather than just perform cost-cutting and facelifts.
sigpicTwo more feet and I can fit it in the fridge!!-Homer S.
Me: 2007 Golf GTI DSG
Mrs: 2005 Honda Odyssey (Keeps me grounded!)
One of the tax thresholds in Germany / EU is at 1.4L (ie. 1.4L is in lower group than say 1.5 of 2L). Hence the use and multitude of 1.4L engines from Europe (Polo, Golf, Corsa, Fiesta etc)
Gone: 2009 MkV GTI DSG United Grey; 2005 MkV Comfortline
Thats ... I'm sorry that looks pretty bad. Lets just hope that the GTi's and the ARRR32's look a bit better.
I wouldn't buy that, I guess I'm skipping that generation and going for the mkVII, whatever the hell that would look like... better not look like a Toyota or something...
Comment