If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed, registering will remove the in post advertisements. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This means you should apply for your renewal now to avoid any disruptions to your membership whilst the renewal process is taking place! NOTE: If you have an auto renewing subscription this will happen automatically.
Jesus guys! Show me a car that looks much better after slamming into a solid concrete block at 100kph... I actually think older cars would fare BETTER than modern cars - not necessarily the occupants - but the cars.
Some of the comments say that the car was a poorly repaired cut and shut weld job, had the tail shaft removed, and had 300kg ballast in the boot.
You can clearly see the effect of the ballast - the inertia in the boot area as the vehicle crashes is spectacular.
And yes, I'm glad that we've come a long way since then, although a crash at that speed in any car into a solid immovable object is likely to not end well...
Actually now that you mention it, I'd really like to see how a modern VW sedan (Passat or Jetta) would hold up in a crash in those circumstances. And how the frame would hold up would be interesting too..
2002 Volkswagen Bora V5 - 2007 Mazda 3 GT - 1998 Ford Contour Sport - 2010 Volkswagen Jetta 2.0T - 2013 Volkswagen Passat 130TDI - 2015 Ford Escape 1.5 - 2016 Subaru WRX - 2018 Volkswagen Golf R Wolfsburg Wagon
As much as they don't show the circumstances of the incident that caused the damage, it's nice to know that the cabin area seemed to stand up pretty well... Well, excpet for 1:17 - 1:20.
Comment