I have use both on my car/s.
Good year is good when new, but worn quicker then the conti.
In wet, the conti give you safer feeling (more stable). But in dry, the grip and feeling of the GSD3 is superior then conti.
My last conti 225/40R17 lasted 50000km, and good year only lasted 28000km.
I tracked both tyres, conti give me better lap time (1s only, maybe just have a bad day...), but GSD3 is more progessive and fun. It seems there are not enought safety margin on the conti, when it let go, it let go. But with the GSD3 you can feel the limit is coming.
Just my personal feeling, not technical.
so i might be wrong...
By the way, i got both of them pretty much the same price, the conti is only 20-40 bucks more per corner.
Good year is good when new, but worn quicker then the conti.
In wet, the conti give you safer feeling (more stable). But in dry, the grip and feeling of the GSD3 is superior then conti.
My last conti 225/40R17 lasted 50000km, and good year only lasted 28000km.
I tracked both tyres, conti give me better lap time (1s only, maybe just have a bad day...), but GSD3 is more progessive and fun. It seems there are not enought safety margin on the conti, when it let go, it let go. But with the GSD3 you can feel the limit is coming.
Just my personal feeling, not technical.
so i might be wrong...By the way, i got both of them pretty much the same price, the conti is only 20-40 bucks more per corner.


Comment