Originally posted by evr
View Post

In fact, there's plenty of research gone into this that shows at normal driving speeds our eyes have trouble instantly transitioning & adjusting from looking through a non tinted glass (the front screen) to a tinted window (side or rear) & back again to the clear glass. This could cause momentary focus problems & potentially confuse our brains & slows the processing of information by our brains from what our eyes see. Anything darker than around 35% just makes this situation dangerous. In addition, darker than legal tints DO inhibit your vision somewhat & it's enough to extend your reaction time just enough to be risky in an emergency situation at speeds.
Moral of the story is, it's illigal because it's unsafe not because the authorities are party poopers. Also, if some bastard hit & injured one of your kids in a pedestrian accident because their reaction time was ever so slightly extended due to darker than legal tint, how would you then feel about the argument that it's a "personal choice" & "you weigh up the risks"?
Moral of the story is, it's illigal because it's unsafe not because the authorities are party poopers. Also, if some bastard hit & injured one of your kids in a pedestrian accident because their reaction time was ever so slightly extended due to darker than legal tint, how would you then feel about the argument that it's a "personal choice" & "you weigh up the risks"?
Comment