If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed, registering will remove the in post advertisements. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
This means you should apply for your renewal now to avoid any disruptions to your membership whilst the renewal process is taking place! NOTE: If you have an auto renewing subscription this will happen automatically.
Above Forum Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The MK6 Fuel Consumption (Most / Least per Tank) Thread
Between the two, the 98 makes the engine more responsive and parts running inside it 'feels' lighter, whereas the 95 makes the engine feel more solid like heavier/more mass.
Not sure if I'm making sense here in layman's terms.
So your saying the 95Ron is better for our car?
Feels better?
Last edited by Corey_R; 23-11-2010, 10:20 PM.
Reason: Fixed quotes
Sounds to me like he is saying 98 is better, but 95 has given more fuel economy.
Do a search on the forum and you'll find lots of 95 vs 98 information.
So your saying the 95Ron is better for our car?
Feels better?[/QUOTE]
Sorry I wasn't clear, in conclusion...
The 95 is definately more economical/fuel efficient and feels more 'solid' between the two.
The 98 has more ummmphhh to it at startup, pick-up and when revving.
So for daily driving, I've opted to stick with 95. On occasions when I feel like some spirited driving, I put some 98 in.
Ahhh Corey_R actually understood me.
[MK6 GTI MY11 CW 3-door DSG Sunroof Detroits Dark Tint R LEDs APR Stage 1 (regrettably a few years late)]
Wow seriously.
Don't know how all of use are getting so much out of full tank.
Something must be really wrong with my car.
I've got a 6 speed manual mk6 gti.
Just ticked 3000ks.
Always fill up with 98 bp ultimate.
Never seem to get over 400ks out of full tank.
Mfd is always reading 12-14L/100km.
Im always doing short trips.
City driving.
Always keep revs low.
Now and then I let it breathe a bit.
Use 6th gear more as I hear some Guys say that may improve fuel economy but nothing is working.
Have it booked it at vw this Friday.
Need to get this checked up.
Sick of filling up twice a week.
Any ideas anyone?
Should I be changing fuel?
What fuel are most of use finding you get more kms out of.
My GTI now has almost 20,000kms and driven in similar conditions get around 420 - 440km per tank. The fuel economy has improved slightly as the car has covered more kilometres and country driving sees the consumption drop to around 7.0 l/100kn. The inner city driving starts off at about 18.0l/100km and ends at about 11.0l/100km by the time I am home.
I use 98oct BP and rarely use 6th gear and might occasionally use 5th gear above 60km/h. I don't short shift or drive it for economy.
The GTI give around 10-15% better economy than I used to get from my 2.5l Liberty in the same driving conditions, with about twice the performance.
I drive 25km each way from home to work with speed limits of 50, 60, 70 and 90km/h. I get between 6.7 and 7.7L/100km most days in one direction and 7.0-8.3L/100km the other direction (there are differences in traffic mostly). Both sets are about 0.5L/100km better than my MkV.
On the trips there are many things that affect the fuel economy, mostly due to traffic lights and slow traffic (mainly on hills) and also 2 school zones (where 3rd gear isn't great for economy but 4th gear feels too sluggish).
Mostly I'm waiting for Christmas with a really long drive of around 1200km each way to really see what the highway economy is. I have a petrol station in mind which used to be at the end of the tank and I expect to have a reasonable amount to spare this time.
GTI | Carbon | Man | 5 door | Leather | 18" Detroit | Bluetooth | MDI | Bi-Xenon
My 118 TSI with DSG has averaged 6.3 l/100km over 13,000 km since new so I normally get over 800km on each tank.
Driving on wet roads seems to add up to 0.3 l/100km - anyone else notice this? I suppose it makes sense given the amount of water the tyres have to clear at highway speeds.
I recently drove 960km from Mt. Waverley in Melbourne's south-east to Bilgola Plateau on Sydney's northern beaches in a 2009 MK6 118TSI (DSG) Golf with 2 adults, 2 kids and luggage and not only did I do it with one tank of (9 fuel, the trip computer said I had another 170km left to go! I averaged 5.5 litres per 100 km, travelling at the 100 / 110km/h speed limits along the Hume. Not bad I reckon - I did fill it up a lot (maybe too much?) prior, but still, I've done that drive many times in other cars and have never been close to making it in one fill. I thought I would need the TDI for that!
Just done over 3700 kms in my new Golf R and the fuel consumption is reading 9.5 l/100km. This is off the back of a trip from Canberra to Gold Coast and back and the consumption was reading around the 11.5 mark prior to the trip.
In terms of km per tank, around Canberra with around 1000km on the clock I was struggling to get to 500km before refuelling, however during the road trip, I got 603 kms for the last stretch (Taree to Canberra) and filled the tank up with 55 L of BP 98 RON at the end.
FWIW - I've done this same trip in my old car (98 VT Yobbodore 3.6l V6 running 91 RON - 70 litre tank) many times, and although I stopped at the same servo in both cars, the Commodore would avg 550 kms per tank in town, but approx 800 km per tank when on this trip.
Last fill was 51.12 litres for exactly 930K of which about 300K was highway/twisty country road, rest give-and-take suburban.
I neither baby it (bad for diesels) nor thrash it (bad for any machine — although the rest of the traffic usually seems to drop back a long way when I'm first off from lights...) and rarely turn the AC off.
I fill to as much as the tank will take (not just to cutoff) — trickle the last few litres in to settle the foam and always at the same pump unless too far away (so far that has meant always at the same pump — fuel has been Caltex Vortex after the first tank.)
60+ years ago I couldn't get that out of 1920's Austin Chummies, of which I had several — nor a Triumph TR2.
However, I expect the other overheads will cancel out most savings on fuel (that wasn't why I bought a diesel — just wanted to see what they could do before I become too old to drive, which won't be long now (some less charitable rellies say it's already past time...))
I don't think this article is as relevant to diesel fuel as it doesn't have the same problem with expansion of vapour that petrol does. Diesel tanks can be brimmed provided there is enough space to allow for expansion of the fuel as it heats up. Assuming diesel comes out of the underground tanks at 15 deg and heats up to 45 deg in the vehicle fuel tank, the expansion of the fuel will be around 2.5% or just over a liter for a typical fill so it's not really a problem, expecially if the car is driven immediately afterwards.
Point 1) in the article doesn't apply in Australia as our servos don't use vapour recovery systems like are required in the US and many other countries (IMO they should in built up areas) so the excess will end up on your shoes
Comment