Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)

Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
2 of 2 < >

Welcome to the new look VWWatercooled

After much work and little sleep there is a new version of the forums running on more powerful and recent hardware as well as an upgraded software platform.

Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.

The new forum software is an upgraded version of what came before, it's mostly the same but also a little different. Hopefully easier to use and more stable than before. We are learning together here, so please be patient. If you have questions, please post them here. If you have worked something out and can provide an answer,
See more
See less

How many revs for best economy - GTI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Maverick View Post
    But if you only need x amount of power and this can be achieved below that point doesn't it make sense to only produce the power you need? Let's assume it was 1400rpm in 6th to sit on 100???
    I know what you mean, but if the engine is labouring, it's not going to be delivering its best economy - just as driving 'round corners in 6th around town would be a bad thing.

    Also as an example, you may or may not recall the days when cars were prone to boiling on very hot days (particularly when you had a ****y thermostat). Dropping the car into a lower gear, while increasing its revs, actually takes load off an engine and lets it operate more effectively and hence would drop its coolant temperature.

    So to use the example of 1400 rpm in 6th, it may well be that 5th would deliver better efficiency at slightly higher revs.

    Hope this makes sense.
    2007 Golf GT | DSG | TR | roof | iPod rubbish | R line fog grilles | R satin mirror caps | R pedals | R console trim | colour coded GTI valences | R32 Ormanyts

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by BarneyBoy View Post
      it may well be that 5th would deliver better efficiency at slightly higher revs.

      Hope this makes sense.
      I realise I have a totally different car, but I thought I would share my experience.

      After much testing and elimating as many variables as I could such as using the same fuel and the same section of road. I discovered that my car is more fuel efficient in 4th at 60km/h than 5th.

      Despite my previous N/A car, which would be more fuel efficient the lower the revs (ie. 60km/h in 5th) I think the turbo plays a larger role that I thought. I could be very wrong about this, but my theory is that since the revs are about 2100rpm in 4th and the turbo kicks in at 1950rpm, at this point the engine is producing full torque yet the revs are still quite low. Whereas in 5th, the revs would be about 1400-1500rpm and turbo not engaged at all.
      sigpic
      Sunroof // ICT Tint // Seats // Steering wheel

      Comment


      • #18
        On doing some more reading it appears correct that generally driving in peak torque range, which is probably 2750 - 3500 in the GTI.

        I also learnt that many experts reckon when changing up through the gears it can be more economical to jump gears (block changing), eg. 1st to 3rd to 5th.

        Personally when joining the freeway I prefer going hard in 2nd to 100kmh and then straight to sixth.

        Comment

        Working...
        X