Has anyone else found that fuel economy is significantly better in manual mode.
I do the same drive twice a day for an hour. On that trip I normally got 7.7 or 7.5/100 on the trip meter at the end of the trip.
For the past few trips I have been driving totally manual mode and getting 6.5, 6.6, 6.6, 6.4.
IN DRIVE I think that on the 1.4 TSI this is because the car in Drive wants to rely on high boost and high gearing. EG 6th gear with boost being used to speed up when needed.
VS
MANUAL MODE I rely on rev's and low boost. EG sitting in 2nd or 3rd at low throttle and only changing up when I pass 2200-3000 or revving slightly more at low throttle input.
I think that driving around relying on lower gearing to provide the acceleration is far more fuel efficient than the way Drive mode changes up to the highest gear possible as soon as possible and then uses LOTS OF BOOST to get going because in reality it is out of the ideal gear. Boost must be using far more fuel than simply having higher revs at a lower throttle input.
Thoughts?
I do the same drive twice a day for an hour. On that trip I normally got 7.7 or 7.5/100 on the trip meter at the end of the trip.
For the past few trips I have been driving totally manual mode and getting 6.5, 6.6, 6.6, 6.4.
IN DRIVE I think that on the 1.4 TSI this is because the car in Drive wants to rely on high boost and high gearing. EG 6th gear with boost being used to speed up when needed.
VS
MANUAL MODE I rely on rev's and low boost. EG sitting in 2nd or 3rd at low throttle and only changing up when I pass 2200-3000 or revving slightly more at low throttle input.
I think that driving around relying on lower gearing to provide the acceleration is far more fuel efficient than the way Drive mode changes up to the highest gear possible as soon as possible and then uses LOTS OF BOOST to get going because in reality it is out of the ideal gear. Boost must be using far more fuel than simply having higher revs at a lower throttle input.
Thoughts?

Comment