Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Email Notifications Failing (mostly Telstra)

Hello everyone. Seems there is an issue with Telstra (possible others) blocking email from our server. If you are trying to sign up I would suggest a different email if possible. If you're trying to reset your password and it fails please use the Contact Us page:
2 of 2 < >

Welcome to the new look VWWatercooled

After much work and little sleep there is a new version of the forums running on more powerful and recent hardware as well as an upgraded software platform.

Things are mostly the same, but some things are a little different. We will be learning together, so please post questions (and answers if you've worked things out) in the help thread.

The new forum software is an upgraded version of what came before, it's mostly the same but also a little different. Hopefully easier to use and more stable than before. We are learning together here, so please be patient. If you have questions, please post them here. If you have worked something out and can provide an answer,
See more
See less

103/125TDI vs Amarok (400 Bi-TDI)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 103/125TDI vs Amarok (400 Bi-TDI)

    So, I was looking around at Amarok's, because its 2:30am and why not look at car specs.

    The Amarok's 2ltr 120kW/400Nm twin-turbo engine is the exact same size as the 2ltr Octy engine... So, my question is... Whats the difference?!

    Octy is 1,968cc, single-turbo, in either 103kW/300Nm or 125kW/350Nm. The latter has something uprated. I think its the crankshaft.
    Amarok is twin-turbo, same size. Lower kW but higher Nm, but that'd be due to its intended purpose.

    Could I, in theory, grab the 2nd turbo from the Amarok, and put it in the Octy? Together with a performance tune, it would be pretty intense, I reckon.


    -Matt
    2012 Octavia vRS TDI. Darkside big turbo, 3bar tune, other stuff. 200kW/650Nm.
    1990 Mk1 Cabrio. 1.9 IDI w/ 18PSI.
    1985 Mazda T3500 adventuremobile. 1973 Superbug. 1972 Volvo 144 in poo-brown.
    Not including hers...

  • #2
    Why not just get a performance tune and lose some weight from the car to net a better and cheaper performance?
    My Tiguan TSI APR Stg2 + RPF1's

    Comment


    • #3
      The only things worth doing to an RS is a BlueFin (or other brand) flash and air filter mods. Any more than that and your really chucking money down a drain chasing diminishing HP increases for lots of money. If you really want to experience faster than that you'd be better off getting a motorbike.

      Besides I don't think it's as simple as bolting bits on to these cars - again - would the car even know what to do with what you've added? Like adding the 4x4 stuff, the cars brains might have a hissy fit.

      My first car had 58Kw (Mark 1 Ford Cortina GT) and was plenty fast enough for me then. I hate to think of every 19 year old having an RS (how do they even afford them?). We grown ups wouldn't be safe on the roads.
      2008 Skoda Octavia Elegance TDI 4x4 wagon
      Bluefin 132Kw/385Nm, Racechips Response Control, Haldex Performance controller, H&R anti roll bars, Koni FSD shocks, SuperPro control arms & ball joints, subframe & gearshift mods, Full Dynamat interior, Polk Audio sound, Columbus, Bluetooth, MDI, parking sensors, camera. BBS SR 18x8" w/ 225/40xR18. 3M Crystalline tint.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by wfdTamar View Post
        I hate to think of every 19 year old having an RS (how do they even afford them?). We grown ups wouldn't be safe on the roads.
        Not all of us are that bad. :p
        Some can even drive!!
        And I'm not talking about the local rabble of chromed up Commodores. :p
        2012 Octavia vRS TDI. Darkside big turbo, 3bar tune, other stuff. 200kW/650Nm.
        1990 Mk1 Cabrio. 1.9 IDI w/ 18PSI.
        1985 Mazda T3500 adventuremobile. 1973 Superbug. 1972 Volvo 144 in poo-brown.
        Not including hers...

        Comment

        Working...
        X