Above Forum Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

When to change a timing belt on Octavia vRS TDi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • woofy
    replied
    I'm still none the wiser, I've emailed them, I've called them adn they tell me different things each time. When I ask about the inspection, they don't know, but then again its usually an Indian call centre. I don't know if VAG Australia have a technical division but Mazda and Hyundai do so weird.

    Leave a comment:


  • Umai Naa!!
    replied
    On closer inpection, it appears your service department has provided you with an out-dated service check sheet.

    On the bottom left corner, it's dated at 2008. The sheets have been revised at least 3 times since then. So yeah, the timing belt intervals are 105,000klms or 7 years, whichever occurs first.

    Leave a comment:


  • wfdTamar
    replied
    Was at the Skoda dealer arranging for a few service items and got the attached service sheet from them. Shows when things should be done. Doesn't seem to differentiate between TSI and TDI engines. Shows timing belt to be done at 105,000 km/4 years.

    SkodaService | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

    Leave a comment:


  • woofy
    replied
    I think the gist was though that the dealers reckoned to get to the stage where you could "inspect" them you may as well replace it as you were 80% already there. Looking at the Uk forums they were all revised by Skoda UK to get them changed at 4yrs/90k in recent times as some of them had the belts go at 5 yrs.

    Leave a comment:


  • buzuki
    replied
    inspect the belt from 60k onwards, and inspection is just a visual inspection, you dont remove the belt to do this.

    Leave a comment:


  • woofy
    replied
    I rang and asked them and they told me 7 yrs or 105k is what is in their schedule. I asked them if maybe the dealers were doing a scheduled inspection and just replacing it while they were there, but that meant they departed from the script and they couldn't tell me. They did ask which dealer was saying it needed to be done so early. My memories are that Richmond told me each time it wasn't scheduled but a belt inspection was and to do that it wasn't much more work just to replace it, so they did. For $1200 that all sounds suss though.

    Leave a comment:


  • buzuki
    replied
    same as vw, 105k or 7 years

    Leave a comment:


  • woofy
    replied
    Originally posted by K1W1 View Post
    I've seen too much damage caused to too many engines by timing belts breaking after the owners decided that they could wait one more service to have them changed. They are one item I would never put off.
    Having said that there is no reason what so ever for any manufacturer to be still using belts instead of chains. The chain technology overtook belts in the late 1980's and it's just cost cutting on manufacturers parts if they are still using rubber bands.
    Its is strange as Mazda moved completely back to chains with the advent of the Mazda 6 in 2001 and the 3 in 2004. I'll contact Skoda HQ and see if I can get anything out of them. I don't hold very high hopes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Transporter
    replied
    Originally posted by K1W1 View Post
    I've seen too much damage caused to too many engines by timing belts breaking after the owners decided that they could wait one more service to have them changed.
    Were they in Skoda or VW cars with less than 100,000km and less than 6-7 years old or were they Holden Astra with less than 90,000km?

    ContiTech develops belts for lifetime use in common rail engines

    ...our late 2007 made Golf TDI owner's manual says something like 190,000km replace the belt. I also follow the Czech diesel power forum and I don't see people there replacing timing belts at 60,000km or 4 years.

    Dieselpower forum :: Frum
    Last edited by Transporter; 26-01-2012, 10:51 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • K1W1
    replied
    I've seen too much damage caused to too many engines by timing belts breaking after the owners decided that they could wait one more service to have them changed. They are one item I would never put off.
    Having said that there is no reason what so ever for any manufacturer to be still using belts instead of chains. The chain technology overtook belts in the late 1980's and it's just cost cutting on manufacturers parts if they are still using rubber bands.

    Leave a comment:


  • woofy
    replied
    I asked last year in Nov but doesn't mean they were paying attention to what I meant. I might ring them tomorrow and see what they say. I'm all for as long as possible, but want to stick to official specs. I don't want to come to sell the car in a few years time and find noone wants it cause things weren't done right. I also wouldn't buy one myself if something like that had been let go.

    Leave a comment:


  • K1W1
    replied
    I seem to recall that in 2010 or around then the belt inspection/change interval was extended.

    Leave a comment:


  • woofy
    replied
    Originally posted by Transporter View Post
    It's 7years or 105,000km whichever comes first. But, it is still 100,000km earlier than the manual that came with our Golf5 says. The time factor is important if you do less than 30,000km per year.
    Are you meaning chain or belt, my manual says belt inspection at 90k/4yrs but the dealers say to inspect is 90% of the work so they replace it while they are there. I've asked repeatedly about it over the years and I get the same answer each time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Transporter
    replied
    It's 7years or 105,000km whichever comes first. But, it is still 100,000km earlier than the manual that came with our Golf5 says. The time factor is important if you do less than 30,000km per year.

    Leave a comment:


  • K1W1
    replied
    My vRS TDI 60k service will be mid 2012 and the car will be 2 1/2 years old.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X